Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 46zilzal
anyone who couldn't win with any of the more advanced programs was either MENTALLY CHALLENGED or just lazy and kept NO records whatsoever.
|
Gee...
actually your kind of correct. maybe a bit extreme, I think his words were
and I can only do this from memory because its only on the audio tape..
This program (Val 2) is for those who could not win optiminitly
with Synthesis ,and who could not understand the muliplisity? spell check of readouts or felt it took too long to do a race,With probability convergance and VDC we feel we've solved that problem.....
He made Synthesis
sales stopped, People wanted something better or easier. He made them a program and made money and helped people and the company. So what?
Gee I never considered myself
that bad. I did quite well with Synthesis.
and I keep very good records Those records consist
of 20 race cycles and modeling just one readout
The Early/late readout Which was all
Doc said he did and suggested his clients to do
Many of my wager discision forms
from my synthesis days were used in the follow up
What can I tell you? I do better with Val then Synthesis
or Ted Craven's new program Speculator
The methodology worked for me
I'm sorry that it may not have worked that well for you.
I hope you make your profit your way and have fun
Bill
