Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 06-12-2017, 11:52 PM   #7
barn32
tmrpots
 
barn32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by traynor View Post
Well, so what? If you are using a piece of software (yours or someone else's) that "builds models" using all the races in a specific clump, or all the races that fit a specific set of filters, it might be wise to view the output with a healthy bit of skepticism. Especially those dazzling ROIs that never quite seem to work out when you bet on the recommended patterns.

It is relatively trivial to split data into training sets (to find the patterns) and control sets (to test the patterns). A jillion races is not necessary. Even if you are building models from a few hundred races, it might be much to your advantage to split it into training sets and control sets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaLover View Post
The biggest challenge lies in the way your training data are presented in your earning algorithm. Of course the data transformation can also require ML so we can say that the process is recursive to some extend. The size of your training universe is proportional to the features you are going to pass as the deepness of your networks as well.
I still think you two guys are the same person.
barn32 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.