Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 06-12-2017, 11:37 PM   #5
traynor
Registered User
 
traynor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaLover View Post
The biggest challenge lies in the way your training data are presented in your earning algorithm. Of course the data transformation can also require ML so we can say that the process is recursive to some extend. The size of your training universe is proportional to the features you are going to pass as the deepness of your networks as well.
Absolutely. If one is using standard PP data, finding stuff that everyone else misses or overlooks is almost impossible. Whatever one discovers is guaranteed to be found (or to have been found) by others.

One of the "depth" problems is that the more factors/attributes included, the more likely it is that others will be using the same factors/attributes (more or less in combination with other factors/attributes that one may or may not be using). It often seems that trying to include too many factors is a bigger problem than including too few. Fewer factors, better prices.
traynor is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.