Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
Yes, but it's not HIS analysis, is it? Which is what you were suggesting..
I know, I know.. if he either writes it or simply recommends it, it must be wrong   |
Okay, to nitpick, I was referring to Krugman's opinion, i.e., analysis, of O'Brien's analysis. But writing or recommending, it is still better than a 1:9 favorite that he is wrong, based on his past performances.
That is one reason I didn't read O'Brien's analysis. Another is that it is behind the WaPo pay wall, and I am certainly not going to pay to read the WaPo. But most importantly, the final bill has yet to be written and passed, so any "analysis" is speculation at this point.
