Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Thread: Tacitus
View Single Post
Old 06-27-2019, 05:21 PM   #108
Robert Fischer
clean money
 
Robert Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobphilo View Post
TG and Trakus do slightly different things. Trakus tells you how much distance the horse traveled in it's final time. They also tell you how much extra ground a horse traveled compared to the winner. It does not give a speed figure or rating for the performance.
What TG does is tell you how many paths wide a horse ran off the rail on each turn and then adjusts its speed figure based on this ground loss.
Trakus had Tacitus running 65 feet more than Sir Winston. At about 8 feet per length that's about 8 lengths. TG had Tacitus going 4w4w for a total of 6 lengths more than Sir Winston's rail trip and therefore giving him a better figure despite his 1 length loss.
While only TG is the only one giving a final figure, they both agree that Tacitus ran about 6-8 lengths more than Sir Winston. Not a significant difference between the 2 services.
Exactly correct.

Tacitus is a proven animal, and he was a legitimate public favorite at post-time, in the Belmont Stakes.

Trakus data, and TG figures, do a great job of showing how ground loss handicapped Tacitus.

TimeformUS has scored it 119-118 to Sir Winston. This shows that the pace itself did not severely effect either horse.

Beyer: Sir Winston 95 , Tacitus 93*?(est.)


With all this information, it's relatively safe to say that we should 'upgrade' Tacitus.

We may even be able to estimate what the data and figures suggest was the 'difference between the two'.

However, I do not, feel that grading or 'handicapping' a performance for Sir Winston is easy to accomplish.

I can read the TG figure, but I don't happen to know their methodology.

I also believe it's difficult in general to accomplish this sort of task.

How much do we down-grade Sir Winston?? He capitalized on a great ride/trip, and a gold-rail, while the competition was somewhat mediocre (with the favorite eliminated, due to being significantly handicapped). Yet, he did win the race. He did show a nice response. He has a history of a proven ability to capitalize on great setups, while he's yet to have reached the Grade 1 class of runner.

Personally, I downgrade Sir Winston to' middle-price/ long-shot', and will try to get the money I lost on Tacitus, back(by betting against), if Sir Winston takes money in his next race.

It's a judgement call. Three horseplayers could have three different opinions.
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.

Last edited by Robert Fischer; 06-27-2019 at 05:28 PM.
Robert Fischer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.