Quote:
Originally Posted by MONEY
When my son visits he likes to watch HULU.
For a long time HULU worked well with what AT&T was selling as it's fastest internet service.
Then AT&T came up with an even faster service for more money.
Well guess what, HULU began to freeze with the service that used to be fast enough.
Because of the freezes I had to pay more for the faster AT&T service, now HULU works fine.
Is Net Neutrality supposed to be better for the Content Makers/Owners, the Service Providers or the end Users/Customers?
I don't know how I've benefited because of Net Neutrality, but then I don't understand who Net Neutrality is for. What I do know is that I am paying more for internet service.
|
According to sound bytes I heard from liberal politicians, NN, apparently, was created for women and the airhead pols complained and whined that if NN was taken away women wouldn't know where to get abortions. (I'm serious...I'm not making this up.)
