Quote:
Originally Posted by the little guy
Imagine a world that is this black and white. Agree or disagree, right or wrong, one thing is clear, they found the most conservative court possible that was, obviously, the most likely to take this opinion. Other courts likely would not have.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with HISA, or the decision, just shedding some truth to your incorrectly definitive opinion.
|
But isn't that what you're supposed to do? Try and find the court/judge most sympathetic to your cause?
We've seen it happen time and time again, in a whole variety of cases with national significance on both sides of the political spectrum.
It's how the system works, unfortunately. But it isn't anything special in this case.
