Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Is what I said. What part of "specific terms of your bet" don't you understand?
Of course I disagree with your statement, It is up to you to cite an instance or case where an effect normally preceded by a cause or causes which demonstrates either:
a)no cause or causes were needed, or
b)the effect actually preceded it's normal cause
I.E. you swing a hammer at a breakable window and it breaks in the same way a hammer causes it to break before the hammer hits the window, or the window shatters in a "hammer-like way" without anything striking it.
Not "window old age"
Your instance please?
NO BOXCARIAN WORD GAMES ACCEPTED!!!!!!
|
Fine! You disagree. And I'm ready to prove you wrong. How much do you want to lose?
