Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitro
To hell with all these opinions! Why not just face the facts?
So, all you lofty players who think this game (or industry) owes you something? Think again! Try humbling yourself to accept the fact that you’re an outsider playing an insider’s game. That statement should be accepted by any rationale mind. In spite of any skepticism, the connections will always function on multiple levels from knowing each and every aspect of a horse’s condition to the money being wagered in an array of betting pools at various times during a typical betting cycle.
Why are so many concerned about what other players (that operate at different levels) might be doing? Maybe they’ve got the resources to play the game much more seriously in terms of gathering accurate information and acting on it accordingly with sufficient funding.
If you feel you can’t compete with just guesswork based on feeble attempts to analyze the PP data or statistics, then by all means do yourself a favor and get out of the game. The industry doesn’t care one way or the other. They certainly know and understand who has the most to lose or gain from their exploits and its certainly not an outsider looking to cash in once and while.
|
It's always hilarious that you think you're a secret special insider because you bet 6-horse exacta boxes on Hong Kong's 25% takeout.
And your second paragraph---it's what a whole bunch of us have repeatedly said in this thread---there are people with "sufficient funding" eating up a lot of profits in the pools. It's been the point of many posts, yet you think you're lecturing a bunch of fools who haven't caught on to this basic point. That's why you get so much pushback for your Hong Kong idiocy.
