Quote:
Originally Posted by dnlgfnk
I agree, 'cap.
If you want to expand Actor's hermeneutics beyond the fundamentalist level, it could only be progress.
That's not a personal gibe at Actor, just a fact. There's a saying, perhaps only in my circles. "Scratch an atheist, find a fundamentalist". Most people don't find it worth their time investigating something they reject outright.
|
Sorry. my background is engineering and practical fabrication of of all sorts of devices including prototypes. Hermeneutics is not required interpreting trig tables or understanding compound angles. Actor's approach is reasonable and should be understood in a factual, non-hermeneutic way.
"Scratch an atheist, find a fundamentalist" sounds clever, but might be a false equivalency. Actor presents observed facts. Does not reject observable facts.
Also, I think he has defined himself as agnostic.
Whereas box...................
?
