Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
I wonder what would happen if we all switched to betting WIN only.
Let's say a player churns $100,000 a year betting everything available.
Let's say that player is excellent and over 12 months that $100,000 becomes $120,000
Do you think that figure would be larger if the entire amount was WIN only?
Certainly WIN takes away the chance for a windfall score. But for every windfall we all know there's days on end of torn up tickets.
I wouldn't even know how to test it. But my gut feeling is WIN only would turn out to be financially sound.
Thoughts.
Oh, and Lambo. I truly appreciate the very lovely sentiments you've sent my way over the years and recently.
Humbled
VJS
|
Since I only bet when Mnr is down, when I like a winner I need to get paid. That mindset had made me a straight bettor-until last year, that is, when I branched out to include some horizontals. I play only Mahoning, again, with the focus less on action than on profit, and was looking to better leverage my hard-earned knowledge of the Austintown scene.
Despite inconclusive results, I do plan to emphasize gimmicks even more this winter. And my gut says it's going to be good...
