Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeanT
I pay about $200 a month for data. If I could pay $210, knowing Breeders, owners and everyone else was paying to a fund, run professionally by someone like Betts that might help, I would. As a horse owner I would gladly pay $x for a 401k like she has proposed, but I think my horses are my responsibility and I take that seriously anyway.
I chose the second option.
|
If the industry didn't do such a crappy job, then horseplayers wouldn't have to worry. Making it a horseplayer problem is like saying we should all have our taxes raised to help out the people have lost their pensions due to crappy management at places like Enron, Worldcomm, & Tyco. I feel bad for them, all, but I don't feel obligated to bail them out.
As far as data cost, maybe I'd be willing to contribute $10 a month...if they lowered my cost from $200 to $100!
