Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
Sometimes a review of the history aligns perspective, some suggest that it is absolutely necessary. Only going back to 9/11 with the understanding all intelligence arms and some foreign agency's warned the Bush administration that something was coming in a attack but the warnings were not specific. The problem about a young administration is the enormity of the Federal Government and its soft targets. Accurately saying the Bush Administration dropped the ball by doing nothing then as usual of all governments acting purely reactive. Today's 5 to 4 SJC decision sheds more light on the problem of continued problems in our government, The President of the United States first and most paramount responsibility is to keep us safe. It amplifies just how disjointed 4 SCJ are and the need to replace some of those 4. It should have been a 9 to 0 outcome, the need of the executive to execute his fiduciary responsibility is absolute.
|
Well said.
Absolutely the vote should have been 9 to 0. Any justice voting against a Presidential action against foreign nationals living on foreign soil in the interest of national security is intellectually dishonest and based solely in
political party affiliations.
