issue getting some buzz, but another that falls into the "IDK" category for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Again, if what he says is true (and until all the facts come out, we really can't say one way or another), it wasn't a lie if the reported time for 4f is true, as part of the overall 5f work.
Sounds like some sort of technicality. If anything.
But not a lie. Unless what was reported publicly wasn't true.
If the horse worked 4f in that time, how is it a lie?
Don't horses work out further all the time past the actual reported workout? Worked 6f in 112 and galloped out 7f in 125...or something like that? Happens all the time, right? This case is kind of the opposite of that. But again, not a lie until proven otherwise.
|
this is much the same as my take
If he simply ran a 13.27 fifth furlong, and four furlongs are acceptable, it should be fine.
