Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
If I request documents and am provided with false ones you've committed fraud.
Regardless of repayment fraud has been committed.
Regardless of whether or not I did my due diligence fraud was committed.
I'm too lazy to look in to the specifics of what happened here but if tax returns were provided to lenders that differ from the ones provided to the IRS thats as open/shut as it gets.
|
Now I am using the assumption that the loan was paid in full as was supposedly claimed by Donald Trump.
To bring up a case of fraud, doesn't somebody have to be wronged? If Trump took out loans and paid them back as he claims, who was wronged? Are you going to argue that they only received 4% interest instead of 6% interest? Has anyone ever heard of someone commiting fraud on a satisfied debt. Or is this the get Donald Trump rule? By the way, I wonder how many prominent wealthy democrats are out there that may have fudged numbers on some loans. My guess is quite a few.
Two other allegations were that he received benefits of lower insurance premiums and suposedly tax advantages by overstating his assets. Not really understanding the insurance company aspect at all so I won't comment on it. Regarding taxes, isn't that between him and the IRS. Moreover why is NY entitled to 250 million dollars. Are they the new mob or maybe they want to be reimubursed for the amount of money they wasted so they can try and make Trump look bad?
Regarding NY AG bring up a case she doesn't think she can win. They already won. Doesn't matter what the outcome of the case is. When it is the lead story on ABC nightly news that Donald Trump is a fraud that sinks into a lot of heads. You are appearently oblivious to the games that the Demoncrats have been playing since the day he shocked them and became president. To this man's credit he remained incredibly strong throughout it all. Half the folks dishing out the dirt would have killed themselves if they were subjected to half of what he was subjected to.
