Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 04-01-2024, 11:05 AM   #10
o_crunk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
From the article:

Experts recently told the TDN that the most successful CAW players can consistently win at an average rate of around 92%. At that win rate, a 13% rebate (for example) would see the player enjoy a 5% profit margin.

According to wagering reports reviewed by the TDN, that win rate is an undercount. These reports show how Elite Turf Club players can win at an average rate in excess of 105%, even before their rebate from Elite is factored in. At this rate, the profit margin would be much better than many investment accounts.


There is no timeframe given. While it's completely believable to me that over any random, shorter duration timeframe, a CRW that works like Elite could pull 105%, in aggregate over a period of say a year, I'd bet very heavily against that.

The math is pretty simple. The more you bet, and Elite in aggregate together was only ~15% of the California handle, the harder it is to approach breakeven. I say only 15% because the reporting the last couple years has suggested Elite in aggregate is 30% or 40% of total handle, which always seemed like BS. Nobody can bet 40% and break even. The math does not work even with a rebate approaching no takeout.

At 15% of total handle, 105% feels do-able to me. It would mean they are likely doing less in the straight pools and are slaves to variance of the harder horizontal exotics, where they likely receive the best rebate. Factor in a chalky and low field size circuit like California, and I'd totally believe them smashing the P4/P5 type bets over a long period.

There's a couple things I took away from this article.

One is that most people believe that Elite is a bunch of different teams but as the article explains, one Elite team bet a whole bunch one year and then another team got a better deal and they bet a whole bunch the next year while previous team's handle shrunk. To me, it boosts the theory that there is no 15 different teams. It's all one team.

The other thing I took from this article is the odds drops which have wholly been attributed to CRW teams. When you dig into the data made available, the teams are 15% of handle. There is way more money 15% of any given win pool that is moving these late odds drops. Way more. So I think people need to update their priors on that one.
o_crunk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.