Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Bennett
The Russian forces are weaker than expected, though they have a nearly
endless supply of reserve troops. The same problem that doomed Hitler, underestimating the size of Russia's army, will likely do the same here. Not only is the Ukraine army undermanned, they've gone as far as supplying its civilians with firearms to assist.
You won't beat down Russia by outlasting them. If you don't have an army of compatible strength, all the gifted arms on the planet won't save you. Without outside help, this is a losing blueprint on paper alone.
Conventional large scale warfare requires preparation. Having your civilians join your army is a sign of weakness and ill preparation. If another source of strengthening doesn't step up, Ukraine is doomed.
Large scaled conventional warfare is outdated. Its probably why operations on both sides appear sloppy and uncoordinated. Leadership on either side is clueless. The war is a disaster from all angles.
|
Putin wouldn't be threatening 'nuclear,' unless he was experiencing heavy losses in both manpower and equipment assets.
His soldiers are not adept at gorilla warfare, either.
I believe Ukraine, with Zellinsky as its leader, especially, has a good chance of winning this war. He, not Biden as Jen Psaki claimed, has literally rallied the world against Putin, in one way or another.
The account of David and Goliath in the Bible has profound meaning.
