Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 12-22-2009, 04:06 PM   #79
Horseplayersbet.com
Registered User
 
Horseplayersbet.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
Exactly you don't get your own point. If the player has no expectation of winning (poly is unplayable) he is not going to wager, because the take out is low.

Therefore, reducing take out is not going to necessarily increase handle or increase attendance, because there is no expectation of winning.

The premise is false as I stated earlier.
People do play the poly. By reducing takeout, they will play longer and bet more money over time than they do now. Sure, there will still be some who won't bet poly if the takeout were 10%, but they aren't betting it now.
Most bettors bet poly though.

Your argument is like saying if slots takeout were 16%, reducing the takeout to 8% won't matter because a lot of people just won't play slots. The reality is they make more money at 8% bottom line than they do at 16%.
__________________

Horseplayersbet.com is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.