Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
I am still waiting for you to clearly state the terms of your wager. You cannot claim......
Without a specific cased to demonstrate and illustrate your so-called "proof".
I'm waiting. Again, boxcarian word games don't count.
Scientific American and all the science journals in the world will flock to PA OT
I can then say I helped revolutionize modern science in favor of your faith-based reality |
I already stated them. I'll wager anything you can afford to lose. I'm waiting for PA. He must be in hibernation or something. (Is the weather cold up in Noo Yawk?)
In the course of everyday human activities, effects often precede causes. You categorically deny that this is true. So, herein this disagreement is the foundation for a little friendly wager.
Of course, if we don't hear from PA because the earth swallowed him or something, I would suggest another kind of wager.
When I win my wager, you must do three specific things:
Answer the following two questions with only a "yes" or "no":
1. When you raised your children, did you teach them that it was okay to implicitly trust strangers?
2. Is the Uncertainty Principle absolutely true?
And then the third question:
Where in your "arrow of time" scheme is the Present located relevant to the Past and Present? In other words, you must lay out your "arrow of time" telling us where all three elements of Time are relevant to each other.
Now...if I lose, I agree to not post on this thread for one year from the date you accept the terms of the wager.
And who gets to decide if my answer is really proof? Once I reveal how effects can often precede causes in normal, everyday human activities, it will become
self-evident to all. The answer has always been hiding in plain sight.
