Quote:
Originally Posted by clicknow
Administering any medication to a living being when they don't have a diagnosis that requires it makes no logical sense. Ditto, giving every horse in a barn Thyro-L when they have no illness that requires its use (on or off-label).
The guys in bernie madoff's office, or the real life characters about whom wolf of wallstreet and boiler room were made, felt they needed some "synthetic energy" because a good sleep, a good breakfast, a morning walk, and a peppermint wasn't "performance enhancing" enough. When winning is everything, and there's big $$ in the picture, people tend to become rather illogical in their justification of certain practices.
|
I agree. And I don’t believe in giving non bleeders lasix. I’ve said that many times on here. I don’t agree with the rule that all an use. I agree with the old rules where they had to be certified bleeders. Giving a horse that bleeds lasix is a diagnosed issue and should be remedied. But the industry felt in fairness all should be able to use it. Which I don’t agree with.
