Sale ends tomorrow it it will not go on sale again for several months. Do you really want to wait? Do you really want someone else to have this answer while you don't?
Listen, guys. This NewPace stuff is just very, very powerful. But don't just take my word for it. Here are just a few emails I have received - the message is clear.
Quote:
BG: After today put me down as an absolute New Pace believer. You are destined for Handicapping Knighthood!
DS: Tell me more.
BG: 14/17 at Laurel, GP, AQU, GG, OP and even SA with a $15.20, $38.20, $14.20, $17.60, $10.80 and the rest less than $7.00
6/6 at the FG on Monday but I used a variation on New Pace and it was probably a lot of luck. What that was- I will have to try to recreate because I was just in the zone.
I am trying to mesh New Pace with fine tuning (tie breaking or to gain more confidence to make bigger bets or when to hold back) using Form.
|
Quote:
Jeebus: MNR 6th
If I had used a conventional handicapping approach, there's no way in hell that the #6 horse makes my contenders... 0-for-34 maiden with poor form? Hell no!
Look at the screenshots - the worksheet and the final results.
Wish I could say that I had bet the race, but I didn't. I tested the method on paper (still trying to get comfortable with it). Results like this however, clearly demonstrate that NewPace will be worth the $57 that I paid and then some.
|
Quote:
From HarryP:
I've watched the videos seminars for both "Improve / Decline" and "NewPace". Let me just say that your concepts are brilliant and your presentation excellent. I love the information about the dominance of the first call position. Most importantly, you have got me to change my way of thinking from "who will win" to "who can win". I believe you are correct when you say this is where the money is today.
I have always wanted a method that had the potential to catch good longshots, but what I have seen previously in single-horse betting strategies are low win percentages and long losing streaks, neither of which suit my personality. I am excited about employing one or both of your methods.
|
Quote:
From John F.
Thanks for the update. So far I am amazed with "New Pace" Your work with Regression Speed and Confidence intervals is truly impressive. Its almost a stand alone system in itself. Thanks
|
Quote:
From Mike B:
Dave when you said only 14% of the winners first get the lead at the
second call it was easy enough to check this for myself. I went
through a recent Racing Form and it was easy enough to determine which
horses first attained the lead at the second call. Many of the horses
failed when they first got the lead at the second call. From the Racing
Form I reviewed the horses that won when they first got the lead at the
second call were betting favorites; class droppers; and the most common
was a horse that was within a head of the leader at the first call. This
means the horse could have been even closer to the leader than a head
which is the minimum the chart callers will give a horse at this stage
of the race. A nose is only given at the finish of the race.
When a horse was a half length or more behind the leader at the first
call they failed more often. When they did win often they were class
droppers or quality horses that were often the betting favorite. I
expect this to carry forward as I think I reviewed enough races to make
a believer out of me. This is coming from a long time Sartin Methodology
practitioner so I had to check this for myself.
Great incites to be learned with this concept.
|
Quote:
From Mike K:
Thanks, Dave. I've gone through the material twice and I think you have something. I have been following the Sartin Methodology for over 20 years and always had a problem with using one paceline to determine how a horse would perform. You've provided another option. Thanks.
|
Quote:
From A:
Got the video which downloaded in 20 minutes with no traffic to your
site. I don't usually comment on things I buy, but the first race I
tried was the first race at SA today. Hit $2 win on Argenta ($71.20).
Thanks.
|
