Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 02-24-2018, 05:51 PM   #108
LemonSoupKid
Registered User
 
LemonSoupKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by menifee View Post
The smartest way to subsidize racing would be to subsidize demand, not supply. Hopefully, they will get it right this time. There are tremendous agricultural benefits by subsidizing racing, but the Racino experiment has showed you cannot blindly subsidize purses and expect those benefits to be enjoyed by many.
What is the proper action to "subsidize demand"? You said what the subsidization of supply was, which didn't work.

Monmouth should be a great combination of both. Getting more people to the track can only help. So maybe the compromise has to be that you bet sports LIVE, ie, you only get a license if you have a live requirement, no (internet) betting that makes it, in a sense, too convenient and only really rewarding models that are ADW types. Lots of people won't like that, but it would be interesting, and certainly a boon to tracks.
LemonSoupKid is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.