|
For What It's Worth, ...
I have never bet on Hong Kong. I mainly look at past performances and try to use those to predict future winners on paper. I havent bet on a dog or horse race in 30 years.
I have integrity. I am considered by loved ones to be 'overly' honest or rigidly honest. I am in recovery and will have 20 years sobriety in 2 months. I cannot afford anything less than complete transparency.
I am surprised at the lack of restraint of some of you posters. Do you not have a conscience that checks yourself before you 'unload.' Aren't we mature adults? It's almost like you are competing amongst yourselves to see who can write the most clever, biting reply. Good Lord! There are respectful ways to express skepticism.
And I am confused. So, you think I am a scam artist, or do you not think such a high ROI is even possible, or both? In other words, if I am not lying, is such a high ROI a near-positive indicator of something special?
Can you come up with a handicapping strategy close to 55%? Even Silverman's (who seemed to kind of insult Mr. Benter) strategy circa 2017 was 'only' 36%, I believe.
(Before and after selling, I would want to make sure both parties are satisfied. I need to be able to look at myself and my son in the face and feel good about the transaction. One of the issues I have been wrestling with is how to disclose and sell the system and still make sure I get paid. Ideally, I would let an interested party try it for themselves for free at first, but then what would stop them from never paying me? Perhaps an intellectual-property type attorney could help.).
Don't you all have families? How can you post insults one minute and then go hang out with your family the next? Are you the same folks that teach your children to be kind and respectful - the same folks that smile at people in the grocery store? I don't get it.
Yes, there are scammers. But please show some restraint of keyboard in the future. Contempt prior to investigation is just not good.
Thanks to the thoughtful, considerate individuals who replied.
|
