04-04-2021, 06:26 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,803
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp
Let's say they invented a drug, we will call it Sixlay.
Here are the properties of Sixlay:
1. It cures all respiratory bleeding of horses.
2. It improves the performance of horses by 20 lengths at a mile.
3. It masks the presence of any other performance enhancing drug, even dangerous ones, making it impossible to detect who is cheating.
Should we allow it? Only for bleeders? For everyone?
I realize the situation with Lasix is less extreme, but that's the point of my hypothetical.
Yes, I understand that bleeding is a real thing and that Lasix treats it. But the other side should also be acknowledged- Lasix is a performance enhancer and masking agent (and the people associated with this sport who claim it is not a masking agent are being cheerleaders; in all the rest of the sports world, it is banned as one).
So yes, banning Lasix imposes a cost. So does allowing it. Which do you do?
|
C'mon Man.
|
|
|