Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 04-04-2021, 06:26 PM   #9
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Let's say they invented a drug, we will call it Sixlay.

Here are the properties of Sixlay:

1. It cures all respiratory bleeding of horses.

2. It improves the performance of horses by 20 lengths at a mile.

3. It masks the presence of any other performance enhancing drug, even dangerous ones, making it impossible to detect who is cheating.

Should we allow it? Only for bleeders? For everyone?

I realize the situation with Lasix is less extreme, but that's the point of my hypothetical.

Yes, I understand that bleeding is a real thing and that Lasix treats it. But the other side should also be acknowledged- Lasix is a performance enhancer and masking agent (and the people associated with this sport who claim it is not a masking agent are being cheerleaders; in all the rest of the sports world, it is banned as one).

So yes, banning Lasix imposes a cost. So does allowing it. Which do you do?
C'mon Man.
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.