Quote:
|
Originally Posted by onefast99
“Plaintiffs’ letter request, not contained in a formal motion as it should have been, rests on two flawed premises:” wrote Mr. Riccio. “(a) that the Court has granted Plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction against the NJTHA; and (b) that it has been finally determined that the NJTHA was not wrongfully restrained. Plaintiffs are wrong on both counts.”
This will be interesting another wrong decision by Judge Shipp could give the NJTHA a leg up in this case.
|
Well to be fair to judge shipp, he didn't leave himself much leeway as far as time to decide the case, i am sure the third circuit will give themselves as much time as they need to decide the case correctly one way or the other.
Allan
