Quote:
Originally Posted by zico20
We are only talking about this one particular incident. The tests, according to the lawyers, has scientifically proven there was no injection. Now it will be up to your side to prove there was. It seems you want him guilty on this one because of things done in the past, and that is not right. I always knew he didn't inject the horse. No one is stupid enough to do that knowing there is a drug test that specifically tests for that infraction that will lead to a disqualification. Andy, yes or no, you are always going to believe he injected the horse and cheated.
|
But he's stupid enough to have horses test positive in the Oaks and Derby in consecutive years.
At best he's careless and at worst he knew exactly what he was doing. Regardless, shouldn't we expect more from the face of the sport?
