Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 11-08-2001, 10:03 AM   #3
FortuneHunter
Back from the Abyss
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 254
G.S.,

Thank you for the formula !!

However I would like to point out a problem with your example. You wrote

" As an example, a 20% win rate, coupled with a 1.20 ROI and an average mutuel of $15 would result in the following:"

There is a relationship between win rate, ROI and average mutuel, which this example violates.

Here are some definitions and the simple formula:

HIT Frequency (H) is how often the particular wager in questions pays off in the form of a percentage (%). This could be a Win wager, a WPS wager, Triple Box Wager, on and on. We originally used the term WIN Frequency, but people confused that with a Win Wager Frequency. Using HIT Frequency avoids that confusion.

Avg Odds (O) is the Odds to 1 (expressed in decimal form) for the respective Wager in question.

ROI (R) is Return On Investment, in other words profit or loss on the respective wager. We shall normalize this value such that an ROI of $1.00 means you break even. We settled on this to keep away from negative numbers for loss situations, and to make the math simpler. For example, an ROI of $1.38 means 38cents profit on a dollar. An ROI of $0.78 means 22cents loss on a dollar.

With the definitions established, here is the simple but very useful formula presented in 3 formats:

H = HIT Frequency
O = Avg Odds
R = ROI

R=H(O+1) When you want to find ROI as a function of HIT Frequency and Avg Odds
H=R/(O+1) When you want to find HIT Frequency as a function of Avg Odds and ROI
O=(R-H)/H When you want to find Avg Odds as a function of HIT Frequency and ROI

Therefore, for a Hit Frequency of 20% and an ROI of $1.20, the average odds must be 5.00 which is an average mutuel payoff of $12.00 assuming the mutuel payoff is for $2.00.

So to run this example through your formula again with the correction:

E = H - [(2 x ROI) / AvgMutuel]
E = .20 - [(2 x 1.20) / 12] = 0

If my relationship for H, R, and O are correct, I believe E comes up zero for all cases.

Is there a flaw in the E formula?

Do I have a misunderstanding?

Can you help me out on this?

Thanks, FH
FortuneHunter is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.