Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 03-27-2015, 03:59 PM   #15
f2tornado
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 1,631
I normally don't endorse handicapping material but Stanley Caris' Analyzing the Triple Crown is a gem. This was Stanley's final fractions stats from 2012: If handicappers were to wager $2 on each of our 198 qualifiers [in the previous 40 Derby races] the total cost would be $396. Since the total return on our 27 winners comes to $558 the profit realized is $162. Since then, the system also hit on Orb and Chrome. The angle would average around five runners per year.

Sure, you could attempt to sift through these 5 horses (or in your words 6-8). For example, horses with conduit mares in tail female have won about the same number of Derby races during that time. Horses from family 1 or 23b have won 15 Derby races. Certain jockeys show up in the winner's circle more than others. Buckpasser-x has been discussed,... or whatever angle. Super Saver, I'll Have Another, Orb, and Chrome had several of these angles including the fractions. Perhaps those are the horses/years to double down. Time will tell if there is one or two of those multi-angle horses this year. Dubai Sky doesn't fit the "Big 5" prep angle but meets many of the others. We should be able to separate the solid contenders in two weeks.
f2tornado is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.