Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyC
Is it be logical to assume that a horse in a down leg of a horizontal wager be bet proportionately the same in the horizontal bet as they would be in the win pool? So if horse #1 in the third leg of a P-3 has 20% of the total P-3 pool bet on it can one assume that it will have 20% of the win pool bet on it too?
|
the percentages may not be exact, but the general models will reveal a lot.
If a horse is 6/1 morning line yet is co-favored in the doubles and pick 3, then if he happens to be six to one loading into the gate I will be surprised if he's not co-favored or so by off
I would not list those types as some sort of problematic event.
If Len Bias OD'd today some Twitter account would be suggesting it was vax related rather than the crack pipe or pile of cocaine on his desk.
Just as a rider who stops pumping an empty sore horse did cheat the public, while extremely unlikely to be an intricate plot.
It's possible to mention some things you didn't like and wish would be done better without categorizing them and fitting them to a predetermined confirmation bias because of a need for an extreme polarized view.
The rebates to make it slightly harder to regular players.
It's already a very very hard game.
That is somewhat unfair.
There are some other things that I worry about with computer players but I am ending this post and nobody really knows what I would ask anyway about this.
it looks like we are having shepherd's pie tonight.
Horse racing is probably one of the most fair things that I'm exposed to in my life.
