Quote:
Originally Posted by lefty359
There was a guy in the 90's that proved with statistical evidence that the much maligned DRF SR numbers were better than Beyers in pointing out winners, although neith ercould be counted on to produce profits. His name was Jim Bayles I think, and DR Sartin used DRF SR's in a lot of his programs and not Beyer numbers. One reason I'm thinking is that Beyers, since published in bold type in the DRF have lost a lot of their value.
|
That's because the DRF SR is an objective, factual number.
Beyer's have never been such.
