Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 07-16-2021, 01:17 PM   #11
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer View Post
I'd guess it means TVG (or some combination of contractual agreement between TVG and the host track for these situations) pay/seed the ~$42k back into the pool.

So it would effectively act the same as a 42k 'carryover'.

Technically it's the right thing to do, given that in some cases players will check the pool size of a wager like the P-6 before partaking or to scale their wagers. I don't think this specific pool size was something a bunch of players were watching, being a non-carryover and opening day on a Thurs for a premium meet.


Of course, it's horse racing, so I don't necessarily trust logic to carry through an explanation, or that the media release is necessarily accurate.






Ouch! Especially if it cost TVG all or part of the $42k in addition to pissing off a bunch of people who played p6 through that adw
You wonder if any of the players would have hit the P6 but instead got a refund. The "seeding" doesn't help them.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Dornoch - 67.74%
42 Votes
Track Phantom - 32.26%
20 Votes
Total Votes: 62
This poll is closed.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.