|
The opinion fails on this one point.
The judge opines that since bettors may go to brick and mortar places to make wagers, CDI is not being injured.
The failure is that while the judge recognizes that wagering done on the internet and betting done at brick and mortar are different in scope and regulatory challenges, he treats them as the same in his ruling.
IMO this ruling is a moral opinion rather than a legal opinion.
|
