Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 12-27-2021, 04:42 PM   #25
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
Read the comments. Not the idiot comments here. The comments
at the link. Like this one.


bat9991 • a day ago
This is a faulty study, and will be either corrected or retracted once peer reviewed!
You cannot exclude "Previously SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive individuals" and correlate VE against the same cohort you just removed a significant percentage of them!

You are skewing your test data significantly towards the unvaccinated cohort (which has much higher rate of PCR positive than the vaccinated cohort)

If negative VE was not a clue for the faulty calculations, I don't know what would be!


The authors removed an entire cohort from the study which would have completely changed the results. And they admitted they did so. This is a preprint. If you don’t know what a preprint is by now, you shouldn’t be wasting our time. As. Soon as this is peer reviewed it will be assigned to the trash can. I
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.