Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 01-04-2021, 11:34 AM   #15
Spalding No!
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMB@BP View Post
we should eliminate all conflicts of interest between owners, trainers, track operators, jockeys, etc.
That's what I said.

Quote:
The field for the Ky Derby has just been reduced to two horses.
Seems like a non-sequitur, what am I missing?

Quote:
I am not sure what "distinct" is supposed to somehow differentiate this case when you literally have two brothers riding in the same race, and many times questionable riding tactics has arisen as well, in those some races.
I believe one is legally bound to support one's spouse (and vice-versa) while siblings are not required by law to support each other (otherwise I'm in big trouble).

I wouldn't be worried if Cain and Abel were jockeys, at least not as far as race fixing goes...
Spalding No! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.