I rest my case!!!!

Neither are pretty pictures with invalid data. Most sources cite 13 attacks under Bush. Reports vary, but a quick search indicates that 1 or 2 of the dead were US diplomatic personnel, about 10 were American civil contractors, and the rest were locals, generally police or other security.

And how many of those attacks took place when the Democrats had control of one or both houses of Congress? How many investigations did the Democrats initiate? How many times was Bush even accused of lying or covering up about those attacks?

Speaking lo lies, Obama has quietly extended our combat status in Afghanistan.
He said we would be out.

See the cliff?
Run lemming, run.

Sssh! You aren't supposed to know that. :rolleyes:

I do believe the immigration BS was timed to cover that on up.
Just as a grand jury verdict will likely come just before the deal with Iran falls apart.

Lucky for Obama, he will be long gone by the time the global warming deal with China falls apart.

Those Benghazi commercials in 2016 are being written already.

The 3 a.m. Phone call and Benghazi are going to tie into each other nicely

Security budgets were cut under a Democratic administration and a Democratic Senate, and it is the Republicans fault? :rolleyes:

Here’s hoping the eighth, or ninth, or the tenth investigation...
 

Now, this might be news to a certain segment of the population, but as the AP’s Ken Dilanian notes,the investigation largely replicated the findings of six prior investigations carried out by Congress:

Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

Here’s hoping the eighth, or the ninth, or tenth investigation will finally uncover the truth.

http://gawker.com/gop-committee-agre...azi-1661863432

And in how many of those were prime participants denied permission for the WH to testify?

The story told by Seals on the ground differs greatly fro that of the State Department.

Who you gonna believe?
Never mind, I already know.

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-dru...nghazi-scandal

And they all lived happily ever after.

http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/s...aughing025.gif

No!...Ha ha! :lol:

Well, guess what?
Not true.

A lot of democrats then lied, as well, according to your theory. Men and women privy to the same intelligence reports as the president, so don't tell me they were suckered in by big bad George W. Bush (the IDIOT, as you like to call him).

Once you start posting that Democrats lied about Iraq, then I can take you seriously...but that's right, I forgot...I banned you from off-topic for your despicable reply on another thread. I find it funny that politically correct left-leaners can be SO politically INCORRECT when the moment suits them...