Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Off Topic - Sports (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   Lebron vs MJ (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=131079)

Stillriledup 05-18-2016 12:51 AM

Lebron vs MJ
 
I came to a conclusion last night and I'm sticking by it, Lebron is better than MJ and it's not as close as people think.

Sorry MJ fans.

There's a lot to think about here. To place MJ ahead is really not digging deep into circumstance, place in time, teammates, ownership groups, head coaches that each star has played for, etc. Lebron was winning finals games with Delly as the 2nd best player on the team, Lebron is in the finals EVERY YEAR no matter who his teammates are, he's played for coaches not 1/10th as good as Phil Jackson.

I could write a novel on why Lebron is better, but I'll leave the novels up to you guys. Don't be offended that your hero MJ is not as good, it is what it is folks.

Rookies 05-18-2016 02:48 AM

Michael with SIX rings and being the #1 Playoff scorer all time?

LeBron ? :lol:

I sometimes wonder whether you habit a parallel dimension, when you come up with this gibberish! :bang:

Stillriledup 05-18-2016 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rookies
Michael with SIX rings and being the #1 Playoff scorer all time?

LeBron ? :lol:

I sometimes wonder whether you habit a parallel dimension, when you come up with this gibberish! :bang:

horry has 7 rings, so he's better than mj according to you?

i would ask you to think hard about this comparison, but you obviously have your mind made up

Stillriledup 05-18-2016 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rookies
Michael with SIX rings and being the #1 Playoff scorer all time?

LeBron ? :lol:

I sometimes wonder whether you habit a parallel dimension, when you come up with this gibberish! :bang:

numbers thru 30 years old comparing kobe, mj and lebron.
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index....jordan_ko.html

andtheyreoff 05-18-2016 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stillriledup
numbers thru 30 years old comparing kobe, mj and lebron.
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index....jordan_ko.html

In that chart you linked to, it shows that Lebron played 13 seasons through age 30, while MJ had only played nine.

As you persumably saw, MJ blows away Lebron in points/game (32.3 compared to 27.3), blocks per game (1.025 vs. 0.79), and steals per game (2.72 vs. 1.69). Not to mention the MVP edge (5 MVPs vs. 4), scoring titles (10 vs. 1), and rings (6 vs. 2).

You could make an argument that Lebron will have a better resume than MJ when it's all said and done, but it's a lot closer than you think, SRU.

Valuist 05-18-2016 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stillriledup
I came to a conclusion last night and I'm sticking by it, Lebron is better than MJ and it's not as close as people think.

Sorry MJ fans.

There's a lot to think about here. To place MJ ahead is really not digging deep into circumstance, place in time, teammates, ownership groups, head coaches that each star has played for, etc. Lebron was winning finals games with Delly as the 2nd best player on the team, Lebron is in the finals EVERY YEAR no matter who his teammates are, he's played for coaches not 1/10th as good as Phil Jackson.

I could write a novel on why Lebron is better, but I'll leave the novels up to you guys. Don't be offended that your hero MJ is not as good, it is what it is folks.

He CRAFTED that team in Miami; colluded with the other top free agent to join up with one of the top players in the league.

You are losing your mind.

ronsmac 05-18-2016 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valuist
He CRAFTED that team in Miami; colluded with the other top free agent to join up with one of the top players in the league.

You are losing your mind.

That's a weird statement. Every team is crafted by someone. West and Aldridge went to the spurs this year. Next year someone will go to another team and so on and so on.

Stillriledup 05-18-2016 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andtheyreoff
In that chart you linked to, it shows that Lebron played 13 seasons through age 30, while MJ had only played nine.

As you persumably saw, MJ blows away Lebron in points/game (32.3 compared to 27.3), blocks per game (1.025 vs. 0.79), and steals per game (2.72 vs. 1.69). Not to mention the MVP edge (5 MVPs vs. 4), scoring titles (10 vs. 1), and rings (6 vs. 2).

You could make an argument that Lebron will have a better resume than MJ when it's all said and done, but it's a lot closer than you think, SRU.

But the 4 extra years Lebron plays matter in his greatness you know the old saying the best ability is availability.

Saying a player 'woulda' done this or that if he played longer is just guesswork you can't give a guy credit for what he might have done.

RXB 05-24-2016 01:33 AM

I give Jordan the edge but people should remember that he had a guy named Pippen by his side for every one of those six championships.

Lebron in 2014 vs Spurs and last year vs Warriors, it was basically him on his own. Wade and Bosh were ineffective; Love and Irving were out with injuries. I've never been more impressed with Lebron than in last year's playoffs.

cj 05-24-2016 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RXB
I give Jordan the edge but people should remember that he had a guy named Pippen by his side for every one of those six championships.

Lebron in 2014 vs Spurs and last year vs Warriors, it was basically him on his own. Wade and Bosh were ineffective; Love and Irving were out with injuries. I've never been more impressed with Lebron than in last year's playoffs.

What did Pippen do without MJ? Don't get me wrong, he was a very good player, but without MJ he was more all star than superstar.

tucker6 05-24-2016 09:46 AM

A good case could be made that Lebron isn't top 2 since 2000, let alone better than MJ.

cj 05-24-2016 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tucker6
A good case could be made that Lebron isn't top 2 since 2000, let alone better than MJ.

I have no idea why Lebron is considered (by most) ahead of Tim Duncan.

RXB 05-24-2016 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cj
What did Pippen do without MJ? Don't get me wrong, he was a very good player, but without MJ he was more all star than superstar.

In his prime years, he averaged almost 20 points per game, was selected to the Dream Team twice and the NBA All-Defensive team eight straight seasons. Jordan didn't win any championship rings until Pippen really came into his own. Plus I watched the guy play; he was just an average shooter but excelled at most other things.

Robert Fischer 05-24-2016 12:15 PM

"I think it's safe to say that LeBron has momentarily ascended to the Pantheon."

http://cdn1.bloguin.com/wp-content/u...12/sas_450.jpg


cj 05-24-2016 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RXB
In his prime years, he averaged almost 20 points per game, was selected to the Dream Team twice and the NBA All-Defensive team eight straight seasons. Jordan didn't win any championship rings until Pippen really came into his own. Plus I watched the guy play; he was just an average shooter but excelled at most other things.

I agree, he was a very good player. But he wasn't a guy that could carry a team.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.