Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage (Post 2939616)

I don't get it

[Adams County, PA | Jul 1 - 3, 1863
The Battle of Gettysburg woww so interesting and so much marked the turning point of the Civil War. With more than 50,000 estimated casualties, the vicious and interesting and so beautiful in so many different ways three-day engagement was the bloodiest single battle of the conflict and represented such a big portion of the success of this country wow. I go to Gettysburg to look and to watch

How it ended
Union victory. Gettysburg ended Confederate general Robert E. Lee’s (who is out of favor now, did you ever notice that? no longer in favor) ambitious second quest to invade the North and bring the Civil War to a swift end by fighting uphill, never fight uphill me boys he said woww. The loss there dashed the hopes of the Confederate States of America to become an independent nation and that was his big mistake he lost his great general never fight uphill but it was too late

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 2939618)

MoFoJoe was solidly against the Union, as he remains today.

Originally Posted by tucker6 (Post 2939622)

I guarantee it. Democrats wanted slavery back then and still do today. The only difference is the chains they enslave blacks with. Back then it was steel chains. Today it's monetary chains. Same end result.

But I smell change in the wind. Maybe it's just an MTOJoe bowel movement.

Originally Posted by MTO Joe (Post 2939626)

Your history lesson is just as interesting and beautiful as Prof Trump's woww :lol:

Originally Posted by tucker6 (Post 2939631)

And just as true. There is only one thing worse than ignorance and that is knowingly wanting to be ignorant.

Zero I wrote was a lie. Democrats were pro-slavery, and still are. Dems are just more sophisticated now in how they enslave.

Despite what the MSM have written in the recent past to whitewash Democrat participation in the KKK, here is a University of Virginia expose laying bare the truth of the matter.

https://historyengine.richmond.edu/episodes/view/2358

From the article, which cites the New York Times on 11/25/1871:

"It is also predictable that the Klansmen were turned in by Republicans, who tended to be more in support of African American rights and less active on their inner racist beliefs than the Democrats. "

Read 'em and weep Slow Joe.

Originally Posted by MTO Joe (Post 2939626)

Your history lesson is just as interesting and beautiful as Prof Trump's woww :lol:

Originally Posted by MTO Joe (Post 2939617)

Fixed it for you. Maybe you get it now :lol:

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage (Post 2939640)

I still don't get it.

Maybe you could bring in fast...remarkably, he might have a better shot at explaining.

Originally Posted by tucker6 (Post 2939622)

I guarantee it. Democrats wanted slavery back then and still do today. The only difference is the chains they enslave blacks with. Back then it was steel chains. Today it's monetary chains. Same end result.

But I smell change in the wind. Maybe it's just an MTOJoe bowel movement.

Originally Posted by JustRalph (Post 2939646)

Ding! Don’t forget Prez Johnson’s quote…..

Originally Posted by tucker6 (Post 2939650)

Lyndon Baines Johnson 1963 to two Southern Democrat governors... "These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference... I'll have them ******s voting Democratic for the next two hundred years".


... and Trump's a bad guy ... :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: