Apparently you don't since that was a perfectly sensible reaction to that real estate transaction.

Or am I "spinning" again as you post graphs from 2014 in the other thread?

I'm a little tougher to handle since I didn't get my negotiating degree from Trump University. ;)

I am not familiar to the comparable's of the property when bought or sold, so I can not make any reasonable conclusion, but neither can you.

https://macrobusiness.com.au/wp-cont....-03-21.38.gif

I wasn't the one that posted it trying to make a point.

If you can't see why that one might raise eyebrows I wouldn't be throwing around the dim label.

Like I said I'm sure that transaction was on the up and up and has been reviewed a few times over by Trumps own team because it certainly would warrant closer inspection at first glance.

Don't throw your shoulder out of joint patting yourself on the back too much

Sorry just so much #winning lately for me.

That DACA extension back in September and deal with the dems on the debt sure looks smart too huh?

There are a few sharp posters here still but most have been chased away by tin foil hat club.

My point was it is the FIRST possible Trump Russia relationship I have seen after a year of dims looking because 'something is there'....

I can't count the Russian lady lawyer because she needed special Visa from 0bama group to get into country and met with Clinton camp day before and day after Trump tower meeting.

He has been tweeting a lot today, he even said "they are laughing their asses off in Moscow". Is that going to cause an outcry from the feeble press or do they have enough on the plate today, he said "asses" after all.:lol:

You’re very funny.

He is funny, but for hundreds of DACAians each day who fail to apply for renewal will be $hit out of luck and will be breaking more laws ie: driving without a licence, working illegally.
It is in their interests to reapply before they become criminals. Yet I have yet to here Pelosi or the dems in general warning them to do so.

I think they expect to over ride these crimes in negotiations, this is a very risky assumption.

Dems want amnesty, not applications for anything.
Each DACA is a vote.

And that is 100% ALL the dems care about.

Then they are not very caring at all as hundreds each day right now are becoming criminals and may not be covered when this is resolved.

No one will be covered - AMNESTY is the only goal here.
Amnesty for all.

Do the math......every DACA is a probable DEM vote.
OF all the American killed by them, probably 50% are republicans.

2 for 1 deal.
You think Schumer and Pelosi care about something so obtuse as murder? :lol:

Big announcement on North Korea coming soon.

0bama's strategies are finally kicking in? :rolleyes::pound::pound::pound: