Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Handicapping Discussion (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   OFF-THE-BENCH STRIKE RATE (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=101337)

mountainman 02-25-2013 12:22 AM

OFF-THE-BENCH STRIKE RATE
 
For purposes of a soon forthcoming blog entry, can anyone supply stats on how comeback runners (absent 60-90 days) fared 5 or 10 years ago as compared to today?

Stillriledup 02-25-2013 01:45 AM

Fwiw, i know Mountain is opening soon so you have to be fired up for that, i noticed at Mountain last March when they opened, SO many horses who last raced at Mountain in december and didnt race in the interim were SUPER live....certain barns had that pattern, they didnt ship to CT or some other place, they just sat around waiting for March. Its a fantastic angle for those of you who plan on dabbling in some Mountain air in March.

I'd love to see you do a writeup on which trainers seemed to have great ITM success with the Dec to March layoff last year.

mountainman 02-25-2013 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stillriledup

I'd love to see you do a writeup on which trainers seemed to have great ITM success with the Dec to March layoff last year.

You're very perceptive. That's the exact focus of the blog.

RonTiller 02-25-2013 11:16 AM

Code:

All Tracks - horses 60-90 days off

Year    Starts  W      W%      IV
2000        14091        1625        11.53        0.92
2001        14616        1638        11.21        0.90
2002        14676        1658        11.30        0.90
2003        16000        1742        10.89        0.87
2004        16476        1872        11.36        0.91
2005        16231        1926        11.87        0.95
2006        15852        1905        12.02        0.96
2007        16520        2014        12.19        0.98
2008        17073        2002        11.73        0.94
2009        17244        2064        11.97        0.96
2010        16079        2009        12.49        1.00
2011        15577        1963        12.60        1.01
2012        14925        1952        13.08        1.05
2013        2245        274        12.20        0.98

Code:

Mountaineer only - horses 60-90 days off

Year    Starts  W      W%      IV
2000        544        58        10.66        0.96
2001        712        67        9.41        0.85
2002        840        75        8.93        0.80
2003        1012        119        11.76        1.06
2004        994        109        10.97        0.99
2005        869        84        9.67        0.87
2006        791        81        10.24        0.92
2007        904        104        11.50        1.04
2008        789        85        10.77        0.86
2009        843        102        12.10        0.97
2010        559        68        12.16        0.97
2011        650        76        11.69        0.94
2012        596        66        11.07        0.89

Not a lot to hang your hat on here. All Tracks Impact Value shows a solid trend up, hovering around 1.00 (no impact) for the past few years.

Mountaineer specific Impact Values are more all over the place and certainly lower than the nationwide values in the past few years. More variability as well, perhaps because of small sample sizes involved.

Ron Tiller
HDW

Robert Goren 02-25-2013 01:32 PM

What you need is numbers for the first month of MTR. There are several tracks (circuits) in the north that don't run during the winter. There are a lot of races where none of the starters have run in 90+ days. You can't compare those races to layoff horse running July.

classhandicapper 02-25-2013 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RonTiller
Code:

All Tracks - horses 60-90 days off

Year    Starts  W      W%      IV
2000        14091        1625        11.53        0.92
2001        14616        1638        11.21        0.90
2002        14676        1658        11.30        0.90
2003        16000        1742        10.89        0.87
2004        16476        1872        11.36        0.91
2005        16231        1926        11.87        0.95
2006        15852        1905        12.02        0.96
2007        16520        2014        12.19        0.98
2008        17073        2002        11.73        0.94
2009        17244        2064        11.97        0.96
2010        16079        2009        12.49        1.00
2011        15577        1963        12.60        1.01
2012        14925        1952        13.08        1.05
2013        2245        274        12.20        0.98

Code:

Mountaineer only - horses 60-90 days off

Year    Starts  W      W%      IV
2000        544        58        10.66        0.96
2001        712        67        9.41        0.85
2002        840        75        8.93        0.80
2003        1012        119        11.76        1.06
2004        994        109        10.97        0.99
2005        869        84        9.67        0.87
2006        791        81        10.24        0.92
2007        904        104        11.50        1.04
2008        789        85        10.77        0.86
2009        843        102        12.10        0.97
2010        559        68        12.16        0.97
2011        650        76        11.69        0.94
2012        596        66        11.07        0.89

Not a lot to hang your hat on here. All Tracks Impact Value shows a solid trend up, hovering around 1.00 (no impact) for the past few years.

Mountaineer specific Impact Values are more all over the place and certainly lower than the nationwide values in the past few years. More variability as well, perhaps because of small sample sizes involved.

Ron Tiller
HDW

Thanks for volunteering that data.

Would it be out of line if I asked for between 91 and 180 days?

Stillriledup 02-25-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mountainman
You're very perceptive. That's the exact focus of the blog.

Thanks. I'm more of a video replay handicapper than a person who looks at 'angles' like this, but there were SO many examples of this it just hit me over the head. I think you get value because handicappers have to at least sort of think "hasnt raced since early December, maybe he or she needs a race". They dont need anything, they're ready to go, especially in sprints and you get value betting the layoff horse as some will toss them out thinking they need one to get fit.

Also, there's very few published works at Mtn, so players must look at the work tab and think "how is a horse going to get fit off one 3F work in 39?" That was also a pattern, very few if any published works.

I have a question if you dont mind...if you show up at Mountaineer at 6am and sit there in the grandstand for 3 hours, will you see a lot of horses working out and they just dont get pubished? Does anyone work out at this place?

castaway01 02-25-2013 05:26 PM

Now that Stillclueless has been called "perceptive", look for another 50 threads from 6 years ago to get pulled up. Dear Lord.

Mountainman, it's all about which trainer does the layoff move. Some hit with it, some don't. I can't say which, but everyone seems to be on it these days, so they'll get bet.

mountainman 02-25-2013 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by castaway01

Mountainman, it's all about which trainer does the layoff move. Some hit with it, some don't. I can't say which, but everyone seems to be on it these days, so they'll get bet.

Absolutely. And I think my intention here has been misconstrued. The stats I requested aren't really for handicapping purposes or to shape my own theories on comeback horses, but merely to supply context and illustrate a point in my next blog. It's common knowledge that returning runners now win more often than they used to.

mountainman 02-25-2013 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Goren
What you need is numbers for the first month of MTR. You can't compare those races to layoff horse running July.

The blog will be predicated strictly on mnr results from last march. I've been researching it for several days now.

mountainman 02-25-2013 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RonTiller
Code:

All Tracks - horses 60-90 days off

Year    Starts  W      W%      IV
2000        14091        1625        11.53        0.92
2001        14616        1638        11.21        0.90
2002        14676        1658        11.30        0.90
2003        16000        1742        10.89        0.87
2004        16476        1872        11.36        0.91
2005        16231        1926        11.87        0.95
2006        15852        1905        12.02        0.96
2007        16520        2014        12.19        0.98
2008        17073        2002        11.73        0.94
2009        17244        2064        11.97        0.96
2010        16079        2009        12.49        1.00
2011        15577        1963        12.60        1.01
2012        14925        1952        13.08        1.05
2013        2245        274        12.20        0.98

Code:

Mountaineer only - horses 60-90 days off

Year    Starts  W      W%      IV
2000        544        58        10.66        0.96
2001        712        67        9.41        0.85
2002        840        75        8.93        0.80
2003        1012        119        11.76        1.06
2004        994        109        10.97        0.99
2005        869        84        9.67        0.87
2006        791        81        10.24        0.92
2007        904        104        11.50        1.04
2008        789        85        10.77        0.86
2009        843        102        12.10        0.97
2010        559        68        12.16        0.97
2011        650        76        11.69        0.94
2012        596        66        11.07        0.89

Not a lot to hang your hat on here. All Tracks Impact Value shows a solid trend up, hovering around 1.00 (no impact) for the past few years.

Mountaineer specific Impact Values are more all over the place and certainly lower than the nationwide values in the past few years. More variability as well, perhaps because of small sample sizes involved.

Ron Tiller
HDW

Many tx, sir. The data falls in line with my expectations.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.