Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   **TRIPLE CROWN TRAIL** (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Derby Hopefuls - Slow Beyers (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=151044)

Half Smoke 03-17-2019 05:11 AM

Derby Hopefuls - Slow Beyers
 
Only 2 have cracked 100 - Hidden Scroll and Maximum Security


since Hidden Scroll's big Beyer now seems suspect (may have been due to an easy trip loose on the lead and loving the slop)

and Maximum Security's big Beyer was at just 7 furlongs - so it really doesn't count- he's never run anything other than a sprint - there's a pretty fair chance he's just a sprinter

right now the speed of this crop does not look at all impressive to me


Justify got a 103 in the KY Derby and a 107 in the Santa Anita Derby


not much time left for these colts to improve before the Derby but it is possible they will



https://www1.drf.com/drfLeaderBoard.do?category=beyer


Wow! the Derby really looks wide open now after both faves lost in the 2 Rebels

Afleet 03-17-2019 01:11 PM

Disagree. Both Rebel division winners and runner ups time compares favorably to older horses Midnight Bisou, Elate, R Rated Superstar, Giant Expectations (who beat Accelerate in the past at 1 1/16), etc.

f2tornado 03-17-2019 01:44 PM

A few have posted decent BSFs but lackluster overall. I do think we will see some stronger figures in the 9F preps. That’s where it really counts anyway. If a horse doesn’t get a top eight BSF in a 9F prep then it generally won’t win the Derby.

Half Smoke 03-17-2019 02:15 PM

here are some historical Beyers for the Preakness:



2009: Rachel Alexandra, 108

2007: Curlin, 111

2006: Bernardini, 113

2005: Afleet Alex, 112

2004: Smarty Jones, 118

2003: Funny Cide, 114

2002: War Emblem, 109

2001: Point Given, 111

2000: Red Bullet, 109

1999: Charismatic, 107

1998: Real Quiet, 111

1997: Silver Charm, 118

1996: Louis Quatorze, 112




this crop is not really even close to those figures right now



https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.89b7f8b6f35e

GMB@BP 03-17-2019 02:21 PM

Beyers changed after 2009 IMO, comparing them to 2019 is foolhardy. Been discussed here many times.

Half Smoke 03-17-2019 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMB@BP (Post 2442264)
Beyers changed after 2009 IMO, comparing them to 2019 is foolhardy. Been discussed here many times.

Beyer himself has written a column in 2015 showing historical figures in the Derby from 1990-2014. The figures were higher prior to 2009. But Beyer says nothing in the article about changes in how his figures are calculated. If they did change, how his team calculated them, you would think he would mention it. He cites changes in breeding as the cause of lesser speed. He states that in 2015 Materiality earned a figure of 110 in the Santa Anita Derby.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.cb1aecd255d4

PowerUpPaynter 03-17-2019 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by f2tornado (Post 2442238)
A few have posted decent BSFs but lackluster overall. I do think we will see some stronger figures in the 9F preps. That’s where it really counts anyway. If a horse doesn’t get a top eight BSF in a 9F prep then it generally won’t win the Derby.

Thats an interesting stat. Top 8 on the prep season or top 8 in its final prep?

Lemon Drop Husker 03-17-2019 04:19 PM

A bit disingenuous to compare numbers of 9F final preps, the Derby, and races in April and May for 3YOs vs numbers of shorter preps in February and March.


Back when Animal Kingdom won the Derby in 2011. Here were the BSFs of the winning horses of the Kentucky Derby and their 3YO preps prior to their Derby win. (Derby win in parentheses).


Animal Kingdom (103) 94 – 83
Super Saver (104) 98 – 93
Mine That Bird (105) 80 – 81
Big Brown (109) 106 – 106
Street Sense (110) 93 – 102
Barbaro (111) 103 – 95 – 97
Giacomo (100) 95 – 93 – 98
Smarty Jones (107) 109 – 112 – 95 – 97
Funny Cide (109) 110 – 99 – 87
War Emblem (114) 112 – 98 – 85 – 86


As we can see, only 3 of the 10 winners from 2002 - 2011 had posted a 100 BSF or better prior to a 9F prep, and only half had posted a 100 or better going into the Derby.



Either way, BSFs have lost a lot of their luster starting with the absurd 120 that Bellamy Road received in the 2005 Wood Memorial when he whipped a bunch of tomato cans. Beyer all but called him a walk in the Derby as he finished a well beaten 7th.

GMB@BP 03-17-2019 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Half Smoke (Post 2442306)
Beyer himself has written a column in 2015 showing historical figures in the Derby from 1990-2014. The figures were higher prior to 2009. But Beyer says nothing in the article about changes in how his figures are calculated. If they did change, how his team calculated them, you would think he would mention it. He cites changes in breeding as the cause of lesser speed. He states that in 2015 Materiality earned a figure of 110 in the Santa Anita Derby.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.cb1aecd255d4

Well I am sure it was not intentional but either all the horses at all distances at the stakes level got slower or there was a change to the pars. I dont believe with modern chemicals that horses suddenly got slower.

I dont use Beyer figures anymore to rate horses, and have not for at least a decade.

Half Smoke 03-17-2019 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerUpPaynter (Post 2442318)
Thats an interesting stat. Top 8 on the prep season or top 8 in its final prep?


that spreadsheet is truly great - very interesting

I've never seen anything like that before

thanks a lot

f2tornado 03-17-2019 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerUpPaynter (Post 2442318)
Thats an interesting stat. Top 8 on the prep season or top 8 in its final prep?

Final 9F prep. Even Giacomo and Mine That Bird had 8th best BSF from 9F prep in their Derby fields. Not a very discriminating angle however as it only narrows the field to eight. There was a trend where the highest last out 9F BSF wasn’t winning the Derby but Justify stuck a fork in that one.

PowerUpPaynter 03-17-2019 05:57 PM

true but it can be combined with some other angles. like a sub 38 final 3/8 of a 9f prep, buckpasser x, etc...

bobphilo 03-17-2019 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon Drop Husker (Post 2442340)
A bit disingenuous to compare numbers of 9F final preps, the Derby, and races in April and May for 3YOs vs numbers of shorter preps in February and March.


Back when Animal Kingdom won the Derby in 2011. Here were the BSFs of the winning horses of the Kentucky Derby and their 3YO preps prior to their Derby win. (Derby win in parentheses).


Animal Kingdom (103) 94 – 83
Super Saver (104) 98 – 93
Mine That Bird (105) 80 – 81
Big Brown (109) 106 – 106
Street Sense (110) 93 – 102
Barbaro (111) 103 – 95 – 97
Giacomo (100) 95 – 93 – 98
Smarty Jones (107) 109 – 112 – 95 – 97
Funny Cide (109) 110 – 99 – 87
War Emblem (114) 112 – 98 – 85 – 86


As we can see, only 3 of the 10 winners from 2002 - 2011 had posted a 100 BSF or better prior to a 9F prep, and only half had posted a 100 or better going into the Derby.



Either way, BSFs have lost a lot of their luster starting with the absurd 120 that Bellamy Road received in the 2005 Wood Memorial when he whipped a bunch of tomato cans. Beyer all but called him a walk in the Derby as he finished a well beaten 7th.

Interesting stat. These Derby winners seem to have undergone a growth spurt at the time of the Derby. Not unusual for young horses at that time of year.

Bellamy Road's Wood Beyer could have been legit. That huge effort cost him dearly. He bounced to the moon in the Derby after contesting an insane pace. I think he came out injured and was laid off for months. He returned to run a good second in the Travers with no prep having trained for a sprint. I don't recall him ever starting again.

Tom 03-18-2019 09:11 AM

My belief is Beyer has projected his figures too low with some races.
A couple of years ago, I posted a graph of the Derby and the BC CLassic for the last 20 or so years.

The winner's Beyer steadily declined in the Derby but held steady in the Classic.
Is he interfering with 3yo races too much?

Here is what he gave the 4 consecutive 8.5F stakes Saturday at OP.

Midnight Bisou 01:42.7 99
Long Range Toddy 01:42.5 95
Rated R Superstar 01:42.7 93
Omaha Beach 01:42.4 96

He obviously broke out 1 or more of them.
CJ's numbers look much better to me.

STILL, in the history of horse racing, the watershed moments are:

1, Starting Gate
2. Parimutuel wagering
3. Beyer Figures.

clicknow 03-18-2019 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemon Drop Husker (Post 2442340)
As we can see, only 3 of the 10 winners from 2002 - 2011 had posted a 100 BSF or better prior to a 9F prep, and only half had posted a 100 or better going into the Derby.

Gosh, could it possibly be that Beyer numbers give no consideration to the female side of the horse's breeding, or to their actual inherited stamina?

Imagine that!

FWIW, on a chart tracking 50 derby stats, BSF takes up 1 column. Why anyone would 'cap a classic distance race depending on BSFs is beyond me.

Remind me again what beyer's batting average picking the KY Derby winner for last 20 year is...

Horses like Justify, Amercan Pharoah, etc. aren't exactly hard to figure out...if you want to make 80 cents or so.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.