Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Racing Discussion (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   New Navarro Trouble (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=141388)

Fager Fan 10-19-2017 08:21 PM

New Navarro Trouble
 
Got the ruling via attachment on text so can't copy. The hearing was on Oct 17.

Monmouth ruling from race in June where winner George Cross tested positive for 3 drugs, two of which were cocaine and morphine.

His penalty? A $2,500 fine.

That's a real deterrent, right? It should have at least another 0 on the end, and for those particular drugs, I'm not sure it isn't worthy of two 0s on the end.

What a joke.

BrentT 10-19-2017 08:52 PM

Screen shot it and post it here please.

onefast99 10-19-2017 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fager Fan (Post 2232932)
Got the ruling via attachment on text so can't copy. The hearing was on Oct 17.

Monmouth ruling from race in June where winner George Cross tested positive for 3 drugs, two of which were cocaine and morphine.

His penalty? A $2,500 fine.

That's a real deterrent, right? It should have at least another 0 on the end, and for those particular drugs, I'm not sure it isn't worthy of two 0s on the end.

What a joke.

Horrendous decision by those in charge at MP first of all they waited for a long period of time to release this and they didn't suspend the trainer or rule the horse off. Again another black eye for the good ole boys at MP who as of now have acted like team of cover up specialists. I can hear Jorge now "I will defend this vigorously" really?

Fager Fan 10-19-2017 09:25 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Seeing if this works

alhattab 10-19-2017 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onefast99 (Post 2232948)
Horrendous decision by those in charge at MP first of all they waited for a long period of time to release this and they didn't suspend the trainer or rule the horse off. Again another black eye for the good ole boys at MP who as of now have acted like team of cover up specialists. I can hear Jorge now "I will defend this vigorously" really?

This is NJRC ruling not MP correct?

jocko699 10-19-2017 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fager Fan (Post 2232954)
Seeing if this works

Beyond corrupt IMO.

thaskalos 10-19-2017 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fager Fan (Post 2232954)
Seeing if this works

The link says that the $2,500 fine was as a result of "investigative evidence", and "mitigating circumstances". Are the customers ever told what these are?

ReplayRandall 10-19-2017 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alhattab (Post 2232956)
This is NJRC ruling not MP correct?


From Racing Commissioners International ...


Name: JORGE I NAVARRO
Ruling Date: 10/18/2017
Jurisdiction: New Jersey Racing Commission
Facility: Monmouth Park
Ruling Number: 17-MON-65
Ruling Type: Medication/Drug Violation - Animal
Breed: Thoroughbred
Division: Horse
Fine Amount: $ 2500
Fine Paid: N
Suspension Start:
Suspension End:
Ruling Text: A formal hearing was held on October 17, 2017 for trainer Jorge Navarro in connection with a positive test result which was confirmed by split sample for Benzoylecgonine, Cocaine and Morphine for the horse "GEORGE CROSS" who finished first in the 5th race at Monmouth Park on June 17, 2017. Based on the levels of the foreign substances and other investigative evidence obtained by the New Jersey Racing Commission, which includes mitigating circumstances, trainer Jorge Navarro is hereby fined the sum of two thousand five hundred ($2,500.00) dollars.

Violation of N.J.A.C. 13:70-14A.1 Intent of medication rules; general provisions

Violation of N.J.A.C. 13:70-14A.6 Trainers

Violation of N.J.A.C. OF 13:70-20.7 Trainer responsibilities

"GEORGE CROSS" is hereby disqualified from sharing in the purse.

Mulerider 10-19-2017 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thaskalos (Post 2232960)
The link says that the $2,500 fine was as a result of "investigative evidence", and "mitigating circumstances". Are the customers ever told what these are?

I'd be particularly interested in reading those "mitigating circumstances."

Afleet 10-19-2017 10:34 PM

He is just misunderstood. He works harder than everyone else and people are just jealous;)

cj 10-20-2017 12:07 AM

Title is a bit misleading, doesn't sound like much trouble at all to me.

onefast99 10-20-2017 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alhattab (Post 2232956)
This is NJRC ruling not MP correct?

Correct ...with a wink....I have spoken to both of my trainers and they are livid that this would be tolerated with everything that happened in Tampa and positives that he is "vigorously defending" but again the carpet at MP seems to be very large and what gets swept under it wont affect anyone, but since we have many who are sick of this maybe just maybe there will be a ruling in the near future to get rid of individuals who continue to take advantage of a frail system. Time for Dennis Drazin to stand up and take a position against this type of offender while he still commands the respect of the horseman!

upthecreek 10-20-2017 03:14 PM

Navarro appealing, Sharp Fined
 

Bluto Blutarsky 10-20-2017 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onefast99 (Post 2233051)
Correct ...with a wink....I have spoken to both of my trainers and they are livid that this would be tolerated with everything that happened in Tampa and positives that he is "vigorously defending" but again the carpet at MP seems to be very large and what gets swept under it wont affect anyone, but since we have many who are sick of this maybe just maybe there will be a ruling in the near future to get rid of individuals who continue to take advantage of a frail system. Time for Dennis Drazin to stand up and take a position against this type of offender while he still commands the respect of the horseman!

Dennis Drazin to Fast,his trainers and the rest of the racing world-
"Navarro is welcome back at Monmouth Park next year. We are worried about the integrity of Monmouth Park, but we don't think this warrants us telling him not come back next year."

That is his way of saying STFU. I am doing things MY WAY.

cj 10-20-2017 08:13 PM

Wonder what the Breeders' Cup will do, or maybe they already quietly did it?


The link to the "story" has since been deleted, but I found these:

http://www.drf.com/news/el-deal-miss...pensory-injury

https://www.horseracingnation.com/ne...Cup_Sprint_123

He does have two more probables, Sharp Azteca and War Story.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.