Ali & 4d Chess?!?!?!

:eek:

I don't know what you are talking about here...

I agree with you that he was dumb to trust them. Was just pointing out the Axis of Evil speech that really exacerbated the situation and prompted their rapid race to nuclearization.

Couldn't have just been coincidental timing?

But you're right...north Korea probably would never have pursued nuclear weapons if Bush would have just kept his damn mouth shut...:pound:

You've done some exasperating yourself.

Cuz that's what I said... ;)

Nobody has ever really trusted the North Koreans. Not even Clinton... they knew the deal was shit... but it shut them up.

This is more a case of Boxcar just looking to argue with me even when I agree with him. Except for talking about the meeting... Trump shouldn't have done that. That was bad move but can easily be explained away.

So did Jesus, as I recall. :coffee:

And those who voted for him were even dumber.

5D brilliant

You're right, that 8 years of peace , prosperity and balanced budgets were getting on my nerves.

How long have you been locked away in alt-reality?

So then we didn't have a balanced budget, didn't have one of the longest peacetime economic expansions in history and didn't have any major global conflicts during the Clinton administration?

If you look back at the previous posts, #28 you mentioned Bush and said Clinton lied about North Korea, E.Traveler responded in post #32 said "He" was dumb to trust them, I have to assume 'he' was Clinton because Bush obviously didn't trust NK. (That's why one should always ID a subject before using pronouns, end of grammar lesson). You in Post # 37 said those who voted for him were dumber.And then I replied to you.

It's not that difficult to follow. The leg bone's connected to the knee bone, etc, etc..

Yeah...an your point is...??? Meanwhile, mine still stands. :coffee:

Even if I explained my "point",(successful administration's usually get re-elected) you still wouldn't acknowledge it because you have an adversity to giving Democrats credit for anything. Well, that's fine, you can't have much of a jigsaw puzzle if all the pieces are the same.I know you love back-and-forths but I don't.

Have an outstanding rest of your day, sir. :ThmbUp:

Really? I think in many cases, low-information voters account for administrations getting re-elected. Both Obama and Clinton are living proofs of this.

And my adversity is not toward one party or another per se. My adversity is toward the political ideology of this party or that one, generally, and the candidate in particular. What both Clinton and Obama had in common was that they're both lying commie- loving globalists. These kinds of candidates don't do much for me. (And for you info, I was never a big fan of either of the Bushes either -- just to keep it fair and balanced. Both of them were big globalist RINOS.)

I prefer transparency over jigsaw puzzle pieces.

Not over this subject material, I don't. Warts or pimples make for better, more wholesome and intellectually-challenging topics.

Why thank you, sir. And you likewise. :coffee:

Huh??

Al Qeda came to be, grew unchallenged and made several disasterous attacks on US interests overseas. They came here and attack the WTC and sent trainees here to prepare and launch 9/11.

All while we had a POS POTUS lying about his runaway zipper and his bitch of a wife attacking women victims.

Get a grip, Clinton never gave us a rosegarden.
And oh, it was Reagan's policies that gave us the good economy.