Which headline is more disgraceful?
 

Hard to decide

The one with the turd in it.

A guy who has been shown over and over again as the face of bigotry in America and un-American gets to soil the furniture in OUR Oval office. :mad:

You're really giving him to much credit there, Tom. :cool:

I don't know, we can ignore Sharpton. We cannot ignore the IRS

Did the Feds take Sharpton's backtaxes of $5 million? If yes, then I am sorta ok with that small headline

Speaking of the IRS, we know that they were sending the confidential files of taxpayers - ILLEGALLY - to the White House.

Remember, Obama said there was not a shred of anything not on the up and up going on at the IRS?

The new, improved, REPUBLICAN Congress needs to get Obama hung up with investigation after investigation, so that we get him under oath. That is how Clinton got impeached, remember? He lied under oath.

Good point!

boys and girls,start emailing you congress people and ask them if they still need your vote...get the drift?

revised

Sharpton is demanding that we put cameras on every cop.
Over $100 million to do that.
Let's start with HIM buying $5 million worth to see how it works out?

we expect cops to deal with what ever or who ever comes along regardless of size, mental stability, armament and etc.

They get 3 seconds that us sidewalk engineers will take 4 years to solve.

The Big Mike, high on drugs, was in the car! Is it legal in Missouri to walk down the street high on drugs? Is it legal in Missouri to charge a police officer in his patrol car?0

As soon as Reverend Al gets $5M to pay his taxes this will be over.