First Indictments Issued In Clinton Uranium One Russian Bribery Case
 

And I thought that Uranium One was legit.

"The Justice Department issued the first indictment in the Uranium One scandal to the co-president of a Maryland-based nuclear transportation company.

Mark Lambert was charged in an 11-count indictment with wire fraud, money laundering and violating the foreign corruption practices act.

The crimes stem from an alleged scheme orchestrated to bribe officials from a subsidiary of the Russian state-owned energy company Rosatom."

http://www.oann.com/first-indictment...-bribery-case/

Interesting. Thank you $$$ for the link!

You mean that giving donations to the Clinton foundation in exchange for favors from the State Department is not legit?

If this is one of the charges, the flood gate is slowly opening, and a trickle will become a steady stream as the money laundering slush fund gets exposed.

The Clintons have got to have the cleanest danged money in history!

The acronym RICO in association with the Clintons will be on everyone's lips before all is said and done with Uranium One and the Foundation.

Mr. Sessions IS doing his job. Crow will be served as requested.:D

That would be a very pleasant and welcomed surprise. I would love to stand corrected on that guy.

They are saying that over two thirds of the 'players' in the beltway are tied to the Foundation in some way. It would cause a governmental crisis if they took them all down. I guess there will be quite a bit of stench while the swamp gets drained.

Sounds like a real s**thole.:D

What was the Uranium One scandal? Of course it was nothing, but what it supposedly was, was that Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of US Uranium to a Russian company in exchange for bribes from the Russians through her family's Foundation.

Of course this all ignores that at least nine other agencies also had to approve the transfer and that there is no proof that any of the donations to the Clinton Foundation personally benefited any of the Clintons. It's just that you all want it to be true so badly.

What does this current, real, scandal have to do with the fake Uranium One scandal. Absolutely nothing!

Mark Lambert bribed (allegedly) Russian officials to obtain contracts to transport nuclear material from Russia to the United States. The material in question was civilian grade nuclear material legally being transported. The crime comes with the bribery.

There is no way that this indictment has any connection with the phony Uranium One scandal. One involved uranium leaving the United States (it wasn't) The other involved uranium coming into the United States (it was legally)

One involved a private citizen of the USA possibly breaking the law. The other involved numerous government officials working within the law.

One (falsely) claimed bribery originating in Russia and coming to the United States. The other actually involved bribery originating in the United States going to Russia.

Is there any evidence that Mark Lambert has any connection to the Clintons?

mostie, a lot more there than there is in the Trump/RUSSIANS probe. :headbanger:

Not really, the FBI will question people and drill them non-stop for 10 hours about phone calls from months before. Of course they already have transcripts of the phone calls because of their FISA warrants. Then they will charge people with lying to the FBI, because they can not remember every word they said over a phone conversation from months ago.

If only I was in the casket business about now :pound:

:lol:William Campbell-whistleblower was gagged by Holder, Lynch, has not testified yet.



DOJ-Lynch, Yates, Ohr, Carlin, L.Page

FBI-Comey, McCabe, Baker, Preistap, Strzok

Fusion GPS-Simpson, Steele, Clinton, Jacoby, N. Ohr

All guilty. All connected. :D

That about sums it up. There WAS a conspiracy in the last election. The truth will come out one way or another, but I know where the smoke is coming from at this point, so my bet's been placed.

I'm going to redboard, kind of, on Sessions. I've always felt like he has been preparing his case while others were disappointed he didn't start throwing chum right away. And any way it gets sliced there are probably serious historical negatives to one party in power of jailing all the office-holders of the previous administration (even if they deserve it), so I am willing to let Sen. Jeff continue to do his thing. A proper balance can be a difficult thing to achieve, and doesn't have to be perfect the first time around.

I do not think Sessions is heavily involved except that no 'STAND DOWN' order has been placed like the previous administration.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNDL9FEXUAEa1To.jpg

This is fun Dan. I must say that she is a regular chip off Hillary's block, not that there's anything wrong with that.

this will be like Mueller's investigation. Indict a couple piss ants to justify their time spent and try to quiet people down. none of the players will be sought after. corrupt politicians protect corrupt politicians doesn't matter their affiliation That's why you will see guys like Trey step down from different committees and such. Probably even resign from office completely. :bang:

aint happening

Posting a pic of Chelsea Clinton as a child trafficker, and then for some reason telling me it's fun, in a thread I haven't even posted in?

Nothing like doing this :jump: to show everyone what level of creep you are..

Agree completely, I think if prison for the Clintons is your objective it would have to be thru the Clinton Foundation.:headbanger::popcorn::popcorn:

hahaha, you're an unbelievably black pot Dan, so I don't buy your fake outrage. You've posted MUCH worse. That said, the pic doesn't insinuate that Chelsea was a child trafficker, only that she benefited from it in some way. Her mom and dad were likely the traffickers. Nothing that brings in cash is beneath them. Nothing.

This is exactly what SNL, the jerk Colbert and the rest the late night zombies call humor - when it on TRUMP!

Only this one is probably TRUE!

What are you talking about? What “worse”? Give me an example, creeper..
Thanks for the clarification :rolleyes: :bang:

Name calling is what children and snowflakes do I guess. Keep on keeping on Dan. I'm sure you'll come up with an appropriate pic to describe all this soon. It's all you seem to have.

You brought my name up in a thread I hadn't even posted in, creep. And then when I ask you why, you claim some bullshit that you can't even back up, and then whine about being called a bad name. :(

But I'm the snowflake.. :lol: :blush:

:lol::lol::lol:

hcap!
Please be aware that it will not be the melting glaciers you have to worry about.
It will the meltdown of the snowflakes!

:pound::pound::pound:

Plot Thickens
 

this news is a couple years old, although the dims refuse to believe it.

If I had created this photoshop, the sign would read "If Webster Hubbell and Hillary Clinton had a daughter...."

ooops...

WOW, she does look a little like Webster.

A little:lol:

there is no doubt it's Web's kid. none whatsoever. You know damn well she isn't a 23NME user lol

At this point what difference does it make!:lol:

Seeing as how were picking on the daughters of disturbed rich parents. Can anyone photo shop me a pic of Ivanka with a pearl necklace wearing a sign saying Daddy was thinking of me when he banged Stormy Daniels.

Mutuel,

This is the most disgusting post by far I have seen in the last year.

I agree.