Inner Dirt |
09-11-2018 12:33 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMB@BP
(Post 2369082)
I think the top riders need to start paying their fair share, maybe a cap at like 60% of their income and then the rest can go to the jockeys who are less fortunate.
|
Less fortunate? I would think the only time I would refer to a jockey as "less fortunate" is if he or she had the bad luck of being often injured through no fault of there own. Like any athlete I am pretty sure if they are good at their craft, responsible and dedicated they will find their way to earn a good living.
I am pretty sure jockeys that have spent decades riding nothing but 50-1 shots at 3rd rate tracks are doing so because they are lacking in either skills, dedication or responsibility or all of the above.
I used to go to the harness races a lot during the late 70's through mid 80's
at HOL, LOS AL, and FPX. Some drivers were constantly bad, getting parked, boxed in, battling through a :58 flat opening half with pacers that back then went 2:04 for a mile,etc,etc. There was nothing "less fortunate" about them. They probably would not even be driving if they didn't train and own the horses.
Someone in the know may correct me if my assumptions are wrong.
|