Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
(Post 2810927)
|
I didn't mean it in a bad way. I've done the same thing myself at times and usually it is the right call.
I don't agree on this particular call, but there are reasons. A big one is that though are speed charts are probably similar at most distances, I think I give faster ratings at longer distances, and it isn't by accident.
My speed charts are much newer. They equate what horses do at specific distances for fairly recent times to each other. As far as I know Beyer is still using the same charts from when he wrote "Picking Winners" (with some adjustments) back in the 1970s.
Horses were a lot better going longer distances back then than they are now. So unless you adjust the charts, the same class horses are going to get lower figures at longer distances. Tracks have also changed quite a bit in that they are slower. That has probably changed the relationship between distances as well.
Maybe Beyer has made big changes, but from what I've seen I don't think so and I believe that is why we differ on these longer races more often than shorter ones.
|