The face of White Supremacy
 

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/...6&q=60&o=f&l=f

George Orwell says hello!

Have you seen the movie?

It looks like my cop neighbor. Honest.

doublethink

Deep

Or is this the face of white supremacist

Right you are. This behavior is nothing new. it's the result of physiological damage. AND it it no way refutes the assertion that white supremacy is the root cause of the coming civil war, just as it was for the previous civil war.

Riiiiiggggghhhhhhhtttttt......shhhhhhhuuuuurrrrree ee

Any other hoops you want to jump through this morning?

I didn't get that you were referring to the hat...I should have known better.

No, I haven't seen the movie.

No worries.

Indie film maybe tough to find. A friend did the score.

So blacks wanting off the plantation have brain damage? Is that what you meant to say? Was Robert Byrd your neighbor?

That tough guy drinks White Claw? Will the insurrection be fueled by seltzers?

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5...n-the-military

The drink of all white supremacists...what else would it be?

I'm really hoping this is you being sarcastic.

PS. THE CUCKING KEEPS GETTING MORE AND MORE INTENSE

I personally think they should round up EVERY SINGLE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN in the USA and throw them into death camps:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opini...-BB1cMPwV?rt=0

This will solve the WHITE SUPREMACY CRISIS once and for all.

Wait for the attack on the makers of White Claw. They will want it banned as a racist beverage.

That's the biggest challenge concerning white supremacy. There are just as many white supremists on the left as the right, but they're cloaked, they're camouflaged, with subtler methods, but the same desire, to protect and insure their family's long-standing high position in society. Does anybody really believe the Kennedys and Gores and what have yous on the left are really and truly committed to sharing the national hegemony? Give them corporate positions with titles, give them comparable salaries or whatever, but never, ever, ever, let them enter that one last final door.

Can anybody show me a Kennedy that has ever been in a relationship with anyone other than a lilly white from the finer, upper-crust of society? Or a Roosevelt? If there has been, I'm unaware of it, and would be a bit surprised if anyone could point one out. My ignorance may come back to smack me on this one, but, if someone can point one out, let's see it.

Caroline Kennedy's husband is Jewish. Does that count?

In the strictest sense, yea, it counts.

Gotta play fair.

As there is black supremacy and many of those are caucasian.

Maria Shriver married Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger.

I would counter Arnold is acceptable. New blood. But acceptable.

JFK and Teddy were infamous for their trysts. Some not from the upper crust.


Joe Sr. was notorious for frequently cheating on his wife, Rose, and it turns out, didn’t have much of a filter for suggestive comments, either – even when it came to his daughter Kick’s friends.

As a child, Kick’s friends were often uncomfortable around her father, who would touch or pinch them without their consent. At times, he’d even ask for a kiss at the end of the night, Byrne writes.

This discomfort came to head when Kick’s friend Charlotte McDonnell accidentally entered Joe’s suite at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York. Joe spoke to McDonnell, while he was standing in a towel, making jokes of a sexual nature, which she was appalled by.

Up until the mid 60’s most everyone married within their tribe. I’m old enough to remember when interracial marriage was viscerally shocking. Jews and gentiles/Catholics and Protestants were an oddity as well.

Times have changed but I suspect that rich/poor will be the last to fade. Those with wealth and privilege are vain to give it up. The ultimate bigots. And the nouveau riche are worse.

Come on. You have to have known what I meant by "relationship".

I see it exactly the same way. The first interracial marriage I was ever aware of as a kid was Oscar Robertson. I was maybe 8 years old and I remember asking my dad, "Isn't that illegal?"

Forgive me. I was a little kid and grew up in a neighborhood of Scandinavian fishermen. At the rec center I played in growing up, the only time there were any black kids there were when they bussed up from the Central District for rec center sponsored basketball games. There wasn't a black family living within 3 miles of my house in the Ballard neighborhood of Seattle in the 70s.

More on subject, this touches very close to the facts of what we are dealing with at this time. There is really a battle to demarcate the elitists and the unwashed masses, and it's not based on racial standards. It's much more based on economic standards, and the white middle class is the target. There isn't a true effort to bring the black man up as there is to consolidate the bottom economic classes, to create a class, irrespective of race, of citizens reliant on government, and content being that way. The racial tensions are truly a cloak as to what the real efforts are. The left doesn't represent the underprivileged as much as they are consolidating they're base of control. Race is an easy diversion. It's simple for the masses to understand, and white guilt is proving to be an easy sale, much easier than "trust us at the top to look out for you" is to sell.

Edit: I read an article yesterday where anti-terrorism think tanks are comparing what happened in DC with the "Lost Cause" movements of the post civil war era in the south. However, and I could be wrong, but on Jan. 6, I didn't notice any posters or any mentions at all in the crowd, of "Save the White Race" or "Protect White Womenhood" or anything that could be construed as "racial". The media and left has equated "Love of America" with "White Supremacy". That's flat out ugly.

Ugly times we live in. The liars are winning the game.

Cue the photos of the confederate flag at the Jan 6 rally.

Confederate Flag=White Supremacy?

Yep. Keep it simple. The media wins again.

Your post reminds me of my grandfather's comments to me 60 yrs ago about the civil war wasn't "all about slavery" to most southerners because most didn't own slaves. There were deeper issues to many southerners that didn't relate to race

Thanks for reminding me how history is written. Fake news we call it now

Pretty much.

You have a different opinion?

Your grandfather was very astute. It was much deeper than slavery. The economic power of the nation was tilting northward due to the industrial revolution. The south was fighting as much for Virginia's position on the power totem pole as she was for the right to own slaves, though don't minimize this motive. Even though the majority of land owners in the south at that time didn't own slaves, they would be damned first before some one told them they couldn't. Everything, I mean everything, of any consequence in antebellum America, went through the Virginian decision makers before it saw the light of day. Virginia, economically, was to antebellum America what California is to the USA today. Except two-fold. California is held in check by the powerful New England leftist establishment. There was no check like that on Virginia until the 1850s.

Yes I do.

I don't deny there are white supremists in America. I mean, duh. But absolutely everything and anything that doesn't conform to the racial discussion today is proof of white supremacy? If the guy would have been wearing a white hood, I'd be with you, but the confederate flag means a lot of things to a lot of people, and it's not all about race. But, lets keep it simple.

Aside from one guy walking into the capitol with a confederate flag, do we have anything else? Or does that one guy represent the whole movement? And does that flag in his hand explain everything that everybody was expressing with their presence in WADC that day? And is that one explanation........ A broad rightist movement towards a lilly white America?

Only to the stupidest among us.

That demonstration had nothing to do with race, unlike the BLM summer of terror, which was all about race, and, of course, free TVs.

As misguided as I believe the Jan. 6 protestors were, I agree with this completely.

The media has twisted this whole thing into a pretzel that keeps bending and twisting until we, the people, have no choice but to be told what it all means.

It's so damn ugly, and people are going to get hurt, and others will do nothing but see it as an opportunity. There seems to be no effort to calm things or fix them. It's just more fuel, day after day.

Like I've been saying, this country is dead.

Attachment 29144

The Champ is still in charge America.:ThmbUp: