- - Exacta strategy
( http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=147130)
CheckMark |
08-31-2018 08:07 PM |
Exacta strategy
I can’t bet right now but have a system that takes the top 4 horses and as it’s stategy, it says to box the 4 in a Exacta, which means for $1 it’s 12 and for $2 is 24. I was wondering if there was any other way to put my top 4 in a Exacta still and maybe make it less costly. Thanks to all who reply. ;)
|
GMB@BP |
08-31-2018 08:18 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheckMark
(Post 2364026)
I can’t bet right now but have a system that takes the top 4 horses and as it’s stategy, it says to box the 4 in a Exacta, which means for $1 it’s 12 and for $2 is 24. I was wondering if there was any other way to put my top 4 in a Exacta still and maybe make it less costly. Thanks to all who reply. ;)
|
I got to be honest, unless you have identified a really weak fav who is not going to hit the board I hate that strategy.
It essentially weights 12 bets the same, meaning you have no real opinion on the race and over the long haul I dont see how that will yield profits.
I would rather pick 1 horse, play in first and second at $2.
You would also need to track this over a number of plays and compare it to win betting with the lower takeout.
|
CheckMark |
08-31-2018 08:43 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMB@BP
(Post 2364032)
I got to be honest, unless you have identified a really weak fav who is not going to hit the board I hate that strategy.
It essentially weights 12 bets the same, meaning you have no real opinion on the race and over the long haul I dont see how that will yield profits.
I would rather pick 1 horse, play in first and second at $2.
You would also need to track this over a number of plays and compare it to win betting with the lower takeout.
|
At least that’s no my strategy, the book. But I was also thinking of choosing 1 horse and either doing an $5 or $10 win bet or $4 across the board???
|
MONEY |
09-01-2018 07:21 PM |
Whether you like it or not, if you pick 4 horses, your horse with the lowest odds will win more often than any of your other picks.
How about betting a 50¢ trifecta key using your lowest odds horse over the other three, then bet $2 win on your selection with the highest odds.
For only $5.00 per race, you'll have two chances to be a hero.
|
jay68802 |
09-01-2018 07:38 PM |
I like to play a box with 4 horses:
1,2 / 1,2,3,4
If your top two hit you get it twice.
|
CheckMark |
09-01-2018 08:01 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay68802
(Post 2364562)
I like to play a box with 4 horses:
1,2 / 1,2,3,4
If your top two hit you get it twice.
|
Is this still the exacta correct? And what total?
|
jay68802 |
09-01-2018 08:05 PM |
Stays the same as the 4 horse box.
You can play it as a $1.00 for $12.00 and then play it straight for $6.00.
Box: 1,2 / 1,2,3,4
Straight: 1,2 / 1,2,3,4
|
HalvOnHorseracing |
09-01-2018 08:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheckMark
(Post 2364026)
I can’t bet right now but have a system that takes the top 4 horses and as it’s stategy, it says to box the 4 in a Exacta, which means for $1 it’s 12 and for $2 is 24. I was wondering if there was any other way to put my top 4 in a Exacta still and maybe make it less costly. Thanks to all who reply. ;)
|
All of the other good responses aside, take your top two picks and box them with the two other horses. 1-2-3 and 1-2-4.
If the top two come in you have an extra ticket.
If you have a single, it may be better to bet to win (which is exactly what you are doing with a horse on top of an exacta). You just have to look at the will pays. For example, boxing 1-2-3 (for a dollar) costs $6. Let's say you have a 3-1 horse. If he wins, you would collect $24. For the exacta to be as good it would have to pay that amount for a dollar or $48 for $2. Just figure out the best use of the $6 by watching the board.
|
GMB@BP |
09-01-2018 08:23 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay68802
(Post 2364562)
I like to play a box with 4 horses:
1,2 / 1,2,3,4
If your top two hit you get it twice.
|
I definitely have done this, but I prefer it in a chaos type event, I usually though turn it into a trifecta.
|
NorCalGreg |
09-02-2018 12:30 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay68802
(Post 2364562)
I like to play a box with 4 horses:
1,2 / 1,2,3,4
If your top two hit you get it twice.
|
I was trying for 15 minutes to enter this on XB wager-pad--on one ticket. Is it possible to do this?
Stupid wager-pad expects you to already know how to bet :D
|
Robert Fischer |
09-02-2018 01:20 AM |
Sometimes I also use exactas in a weird way for 'keying' a rare long shot contender exactly 2nd.
You could have done this with a trifecta (or superfecta etc), and those bets often pay out a higher dollar amount, but when you don't have an opinion for 3rd, - a tri or super is less efficient than an exacta for doing this.
extreme example;
Love the :1: and he's the 7th choice in a 10 horse field.
Win :1: , perhaps a multi featuring/singling :1:
Exacta :4::3::2: / :1: (the 3 win contenders over my pick)
Tri :4::3::2: /:6::5::4::3::2: / :1: (the 3 win contenders over the 5 contenders for second over my pick)
.... So now I've got my :1: 'keyed' in all 3 slots.
Maybe I would have needed the poor value of "Tri :4::3::2: / :1: / :11::10::9::8::7::6::5::4::3::2: (the three win contenders over my pick, over The ten contenders for third)" if I were to use the Tri to 'key' my shot 2nd.
|
CincyHorseplayer |
09-02-2018 02:04 AM |
Get payoffs and equate out 2-4 or even 6 combinations and shoot for a 6-1 payoff or pass. If all the denominations surpass a reasonable bet where it starts to creep into 4-1, 3-1 territory,pass. I've just gone through a period where I am picking a tad under 20% winners in my last 30 bets at Saratoga(a common phenomenon for me over a 10 year period!). Have a win place on those contenders of 43% but have a 6-1 return on 31% of those bets. Do the math. I was 3 for 22 before that. Tough game.
|
CincyHorseplayer |
09-02-2018 02:09 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMB@BP
(Post 2364032)
I got to be honest, unless you have identified a really weak fav who is not going to hit the board I hate that strategy.
It essentially weights 12 bets the same, meaning you have no real opinion on the race and over the long haul I dont see how that will yield profits.
I would rather pick 1 horse, play in first and second at $2.
You would also need to track this over a number of plays and compare it to win betting with the lower takeout.
|
I've been a repeated victim of the wholesale approach to betting. It's not my style. Never works for me. I'm fine with that.
|
CincyHorseplayer |
09-02-2018 02:17 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay68802
(Post 2364562)
I like to play a box with 4 horses:
1,2 / 1,2,3,4
If your top two hit you get it twice.
|
I do this a lot in the winter Jay. Bet the higher odds horse to win and double key. Plenty of 3 x 5's at Tampa or a KY Downs and have had glorious days when I have no idea what exactly the hell is going on!
|
lamboguy |
09-02-2018 04:29 AM |
if you can't limit your combination's to 1 or 2 tickets, i suggest you abandon the idea of playing exacta's or any other multiple ticket wager.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
|
|