Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Off Topic - General (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Take that George Soro's !! No limit ! (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=95206)

JustRalph 06-14-2012 04:44 PM

Take that George Soro's !! No limit !
 
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/...-to-beat-obama


Gotta love a guy who puts his money where his mouth and beliefs are.

I read some place that this guy is pissed about how Obama has treated Israel. This is going to be interesting.

http://www.usnews.com/pubdbimages/im...son425x283.jpg

NJ Stinks 06-14-2012 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustRalph
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/...-to-beat-obama


Gotta love a guy who puts his money where his mouth and beliefs are.

I read some place that this guy is pissed about how Obama has treated Israel. This is going to be interesting.

http://www.usnews.com/pubdbimages/im...son425x283.jpg

I can't think of even one thing to love about this guy. And I certainly don't want his money buying elections in this country.

ElKabong 06-14-2012 07:34 PM

yeah, unlike Soros buying elections.......

fast4522 06-14-2012 07:41 PM

The man knows that this country will face the same fate should Israel fail.
Socialism is not worth defending.

JustRalph 06-14-2012 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJ Stinks
I can't think of even one thing to love about this guy. And I certainly don't want his money buying elections in this country.

Do the letters TS mean anything to you? Not you specifically, but the left who have been owned by Soro's for 20 years

newtothegame 06-14-2012 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJ Stinks
I can't think of even one thing to love about this guy. And I certainly don't want his money buying elections in this country.

I am sure I missed your post where you condemned all of the union money pouring into the coffers of democratic politicians......:faint:

Dave Schwartz 06-14-2012 08:57 PM

And, of course, nobody had any problems with Clinton taking money from the Chinese.

Heaven forbid that anybody should donate money to the R-side.


Dave Schwartz
Who still thinks both sides of
the aisle are a waste of time.

whiptastic 06-14-2012 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
And, of course, nobody had any problems with Clinton taking money from the Chinese.

Heaven forbid that anybody should donate money to the R-side.


Dave Schwartz
Who still thinks both sides of
the aisle are a waste of time.

It really is different now. We are living in very dangerous times for our democracy. I realize most in this thread are rooting for one "team" over another, but I would hope that everyone sees how the undue influence of big money threatens the legitimacy of the democratic institutions we hold dear. This isn't a football game we're talking about. And in all honesty, you really should have put the rolling around laughing emoticon next to that sentence about anyone donating money to the R-side.

Quote:

First, Congress passed the Tillman Act in 1907, which prohibited corporations from using their treasuries to influence federal elections. Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt, the legislation recognized what had become abundantly clear: corporate influence corrupts elections. Later, under the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, Congress extended the same prohibition to labor unions. For generations, these regulations provided the bedrock of our election law that followed, including the landmark Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act passed in 2003. And for several election cycles, between 2004 and 2008, our system seemed headed towards more fair and transparent elections. But Citizens United changed everything.
http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/money-crisis

newtothegame 06-14-2012 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiptastic
It really is different now. We are living in very dangerous times for our democracy. I realize most in this thread are rooting for one "team" over another, but I would hope that everyone sees how the undue influence of big money threatens the legitimacy of the democratic institutions we hold dear. This isn't a football game we're talking about. And in all honesty, you really should have put the rolling around laughing emoticon next to that sentence about anyone donating money to the R-side.



http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/money-crisis

Ok, so is this dangerous times "now"...happen in the last month??
If not, where are YOUR post in contempt for all the big money that went to your candidate Obama??

jdhanover 06-14-2012 11:28 PM

HUGE money on both sides...dangerous because of the lack of transparency. And no watchdog.

bigmack 06-14-2012 11:33 PM

http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u...e/shwow_e0.gif

I don't care what side of the aisle you on, this shit is freaky.

The guy's net woith is $25B. If he ponies up $100M, as mentioned, for him that's a start.

There oughta be a cap.

jdhanover 06-14-2012 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigmack
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u...e/shwow_e0.gif

I don't care what side of the aisle you on, this shit is freaky.

The guy's net woith is $25B. If he ponies up $100M, as mentioned, for him that's a start.

There oughta be a cap.

Agree - there are a number of guys who can do this if they wanted to (both sides) - and some will ....it will be an extremely ugly election.

ElKabong 06-14-2012 11:44 PM

if the sitting preznit had done a fine job and kept his promises, it wouldn't matter how much $ the pubs raised & from whom.....fact is he left the door wide open with record deficits

as for Clinton vs now....it was important in 92 and 96 also....good greif :bang:

Dave Schwartz 06-15-2012 12:07 AM

Quote:

It really is different now. We are living in very dangerous times for our democracy. I realize most in this thread are rooting for one "team" over another, but I would hope that everyone sees how the undue influence of big money threatens the legitimacy of the democratic institutions we hold dear. This isn't a football game we're talking about. And in all honesty, you really should have put the rolling around laughing emoticon next to that sentence about anyone donating money to the R-side.
I have been saying that for years.

Until a wonderful, grassroots farmer from Nebraska with no money behind him (and therefore is beholden to nobody) can get elected, we will continue where we are: A government for the corporations and by the corporations.

mostpost 06-15-2012 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newtothegame
I am sure I missed your post where you condemned all of the union money pouring into the coffers of democratic politicians......:faint:

The difference is that the union money represents contributions from millions of union members. Adelson's money represents the opinion of one man. One man who represents no one but himself.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Tuscan Gold VS Catching Freedom
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.