Track Collector |
03-23-2017 12:22 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
(Post 2140741)
the reason why they want to retain the license is because they make the source marketing fee for massachusetts. in other words they are basically getting a handout and don't deserve the money. if i was the head of the gaming commission i wouldn't give them the racing license for the 6 days that they want so that they can collect. the people that ran the track after Moseby died had no clue what they were doing. ultimately when it came decision time for the slots and casino, they tried to fool the commission and it didn't even come close to working. the place was a natural for the casino license and they blew it.
why reward them now, get them the hell out of there already and let someone else figure a deal out somewhere else.
|
I totally agree, but of course I am very biased. ;)
The property is going to be completely redeveloped with the race track gone because it is worth a ton of more money that way. Suffolk wants to have their cake and eat it too. While some folks will put it down, Brockton wants to run and can provide a significant number of days (perhaps 30-60) IF they can get secure enough funds for OPERATING costs. They need to "own" the MA simulcasting (instead of Suffolk) in order to run their meet, and they certainly deserve it much more than Suffolk because they want to provide thoroughbred racing in the future in MA and Suffolk does not. Brockton may not be the long-term solution, but it can certainly be the near-term solution for several years. If Brockton were able to secure adequate operating costs, I suspect with the work already done last year, they could put on a meet this year.
Phil, what is the latest out of the Carney family given this most-recent news on Suffolk?
|